Senator John Fetterman’s new memoir, Unfettered, reveals a heated clash with Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro that paints a vivid picture of their fraught relationship. In a revealing hot mic moment during a Zoom hearing, Fetterman unleashed a tirade against Shapiro, calling him a “f—— a——” after Shapiro delivered a lengthy and what Fetterman deemed an “unnecessary” justification for opposing clemency for two convicted murderers, the Lee brothers. This outburst highlights the intense emotions surrounding decisions made by Pennsylvania’s Board of Pardons and underscores the friction between the two Democrats.
The incident took place during a meeting where Shapiro expressed concerns over missing transcripts from the original trial of the Lee brothers, who were convicted in a 1993 robbery and shooting. Fetterman’s anger bubbled over as he recalled Shapiro’s long speech, leading to his explosive comment. Such moments are rarely captured but reveal underlying tensions in political relationships, particularly when diverging views on justice and fairness come into play.
Fetterman’s memoir details the strain this incident placed on their relationship, emphasizing his commitment to justice over political gain. During a private discussion, he threatened to run against Shapiro in the 2022 gubernatorial primary. “I told him there were two tracks,” Fetterman wrote, delineating the paths of ambition for both men—one where he pursued the Senate seat and another where he contested Shapiro’s governorship. The frustration over their differing philosophies on commuting sentences led Fetterman to believe that Shapiro’s hesitations stemmed from “political ambition” rather than a pure concern for public safety.
In reflecting on their past camaraderie, Fetterman noted, “I sincerely wish him the best… Even if we no longer speak.” This acknowledgment of a fractured friendship underscores the personal stakes involved in their political decisions. The strain between them became even more palpable during meetings where Shapiro seemed more cautious, voting against parole in 12 out of 15 cases—a decision that drove Fetterman to the brink, even leading him to break his reading glasses in frustration.
As Fetterman navigates his role in the Senate, tensions with Shapiro serve as a reminder of the complex dynamics within the Democratic Party, particularly on issues of criminal justice reform. His experience on the Board of Pardons reflects a deep commitment to justice, coupled with the recognition that political ambition can distort the decision-making process. Fetterman’s commentary in his memoir also reinforces a broader point: that the foundations of political friendships can be tested in the crucible of policy decisions.
As he moves forward, Fetterman remains adamant about his views, revealing a willingness to challenge both sides of the aisle when it comes to matters of principle and justice. His experiences with Shapiro, documented in Unfettered, highlight the thin line between professional collaboration and political competition.
"*" indicates required fields
