Fox News host Greg Gutfeld delivered a sharp and humorous critique of Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent comments regarding her strategy in the campaign against former President Trump. In remarks made on the Storehouse & Friends podcast, Harris asserted that she was engaged in “three-dimensional chess” while navigating her political rivalry with Trump, implying an intricate level of tactical thinking. This phrase caught Gutfeld’s attention and led to a memorable exchange on “The Five.”
The context of Harris’s claims is significant. Despite an overwhelming defeat in the 2020 election—where Trump secured all seven swing states and the popular vote—Harris’s assertion of strategic superiority seems disconnected from reality. In the podcast, she claimed, “I understood the game that was being played, and I made a decision that I wasn’t gonna get played.” This self-assuredness drew skepticism and laughter from Gutfeld and his co-hosts.
During the segment, Jesse Watters brought a comedic angle by suggesting that someone should check on Harris’s well-being. Dana Perino added her quip, saying, “I think that Trump was playing chess; she was playing Candyland.” These remarks illustrate the sentiment that Harris’s comments were not only misguided but also indicative of a deeper lack of awareness regarding her performance in the political arena.
However, it was Gutfeld’s remarks that really stood out. His sharp wit cut through the absurdity of Harris’s claims, pointing out, “She says 3D chess—chess is already 3D.” This statement highlights the inherent flaw in her argument, suggesting she might not fully understand the game she references. Gutfeld went further, noting, “Who boasts of a strategy when you lose?” His humor resonates particularly because it encapsulates a common criticism of political figures who boast about their strategies despite lacking success.
Gutfeld’s observation that Harris may have meant “4D chess” if she intended to imply a complex strategy adds an additional layer of humor and criticism. He skillfully juxtaposed her claims with a playful jab about her drinking habits, suggesting she might have been under the influence while making such bold statements. The comedic tone of the segment effectively captured the frustration many feel toward arguably overconfident politicians.
As the discussion unfolded, the audience could sense the camaraderie between the hosts, each taking a turn to dissect Harris’s claims while delivering playful jabs. Gutfeld’s concluding statement, “If she plays chess or checkers, it’s probably with a helmet,” crafted a vivid image of Harris struggling with basic strategic concepts, further solidifying his position as a prominent critic of her approach.
Gutfeld’s commentary serves as a reflection of broader frustrations within the political landscape, emphasizing the disconnect between rhetoric and reality that often permeates political discourse. His humor provided not only entertainment but a biting critique of Harris’s self-perception and strategy. The segment resonated with audiences, showcasing the power of humor in political commentary while drawing attention to the shortcomings of one of the nation’s key political figures.
"*" indicates required fields
