JD Vance Makes a Case Against Immigration, Promises a Trump-Led Solution for Housing Crisis
Vice President JD Vance used a recent speech to underscore the Trump administration’s stance on the growing housing crisis, attributing soaring costs to illegal immigration and the lack of new housing supply. In a video that has circulated widely, Vance stated, “They’re taking houses that ought by right go to American citizens,” highlighting what he sees as a failure of current leaders to control immigration and adequately address housing demand.
This declaration aligns with the broader message from the Trump campaign leading into the 2024 election, advocating for measures to restore affordability through reduced illegal immigration and increased construction efforts. In a related tweet, Vance promised that the Trump administration would tackle the housing dilemma with a combination of deportation, expanded construction, and support for American wages.
“30 Million Illegal Immigrants” and Housing Constraints
Vance’s reference to America being “flooded with 30 million illegal immigrants” serves as a cornerstone of his argument that native-born Americans face a housing affordability crisis. Although estimates from the Pew Research Center suggest the number of undocumented immigrants is approximately 11 to 12 million, Vance’s figure is indicative of a provocative political narrative that positions immigration levels as fundamentally disruptive to the housing market.
“At the same time, we weren’t building enough new houses to begin with even for the population that we had,” Vance pointed out. Supporting this claim, national data reveals a persistent shortfall in housing production, with Freddie Mac estimating a deficit of about 3.8 million housing units. This gap has widened since the 2008 recession, and by 2023, the median home price had surged to over $436,000, reflecting a nearly 60% rise since 2019.
The Labor Market, Rising Prices, and Immigration’s Impact
Vance connects housing availability directly to immigration and labor policy, asserting that cleaning up immigration will yield benefits in the housing sector. “We’re also getting all of those illegal aliens out of our country,” he asserted. “And you’re already seeing it start to pay some dividends.”
However, economists remain divided on this assertion. A 2023 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis concluded that while immigration does increase housing demand, unauthorized immigrants play a vital role in the construction workforce—making up nearly 25% of that sector. Reducing this labor force through mass deportation could lead to a decline in new housing starts unless alternative training programs are established.
Still, Vance insists that enforcement is yielding positive outcomes. “Blue-collar wages are going up, working people’s wages, middle-class wages are going up,” he claimed. Reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate some progress in wage growth in the construction sector, though inflation continues to complicate the outlook. In April 2024, average hourly earnings rose 4.1% compared to 6.7% in the same month of 2022, demonstrating an uneven recovery.
Highlighting the Affordability Crisis
The vice president characterized the current environment as an “affordability crisis,” blaming policies from the Biden administration for exacerbating the situation through regulatory obstacles and increased spending. “What we’re doing is trying to make it easier to build houses, trying to make [it] easier to build factories and things like that so that people have good jobs,” he added. Although the Biden administration reports over $250 billion in housing commitments through expanded tax credits, critics maintain that bureaucratic red tape impedes actual progress.
The Trump-Vance campaign appeals to a straightforward strategy: limit illegal immigration, prioritize American citizens, and encourage housing development. This approach aims to resonate particularly with younger working Americans, many of whom have faced significant hurdles in achieving homeownership. For instance, the homeownership rate for individuals under 35 remains below 39%, stagnant over the last decade, while rent prices in major cities have surged by 20-30% since 2020.
“The best way to [restore affordability] is good jobs and good wages,” Vance articulated. “And that’s why the president’s focus is where it is.”
Outline of Policy Mechanisms: Supply, Enforcement, and Wage Support
The proposed housing and labor agenda from the Trump administration centers around three major points:
- Mass deportations: Both Trump and Vance support increasing funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and enhancing local law enforcement collaboration to expedite the removal of undocumented immigrants, particularly those with criminal backgrounds or repeated immigration violations. Plans anticipate deporting several million individuals within the first 18 months of a second Trump term.
- Deregulated housing development: The campaign intends to simplify federal permitting processes, minimize local zoning barriers that restrict housing density, and expand financing for multifamily housing construction. They also plan to revive the Trump-era initiative aimed at eliminating regulatory barriers to affordable housing.
- Domestic wage protection and labor development: The administration proposes incentives for vocational education, apprenticeship programs, and other means of supporting domestic labor in construction and manufacturing sectors, aiming to reduce reliance on undocumented workers.
Critics challenge the viability and economic implications of such a plan. Research from the Urban Institute and Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies suggests that while deportations might offer short-term increases in legal housing occupancy, they could also diminish the workforce necessary for new housing development. A 2022 analysis predicted that a 10% reduction in foreign-born construction labor would result in a 3% drop in new housing starts in significant sunbelt states.
Echoes of the Past?
Experts point to historical patterns when considering Vance’s rhetoric around immigration and housing. Previous generations have witnessed similar narratives from figures like Gerald L.K. Smith in the 1940s, who blamed immigrants for taking homes from working-class citizens—a theme that resurfaced during the 1980s amidst crackdowns on public housing for the undocumented. Observers contend that Vance’s framing follows this historical trajectory, albeit adapted for present economic concerns.
However, for countless Americans grappling with rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and the ongoing shortage of homes, Vance’s proposed solutions offer a clear outline of action—even if they spark considerable debate. This messaging is making an impact among voters seeking enforcement, wage support, and reduced competition for limited housing resources.
As the election approaches, housing affordability is climbing in priority on voter agendas. A Gallup poll from May 2024 indicated that the cost of living was the top concern for those under 45. For this demographic, and for blue-collar families feeling the pressure from rising rents and unaffordable ownership options, Vance’s proposals present both complications and a chance for significant change.
“Young people should be able to buy a home and raise a family in the country they were born in,” Vance stated. The potential effectiveness of the Trump-Vance plan to fulfill this promise remains uncertain, but its prominence in the 2024 campaign reflects a pressing urgency for many voters.
"*" indicates required fields
