House lawmakers are expressing frustration after a tumultuous week characterized by numerous censure threats and votes to condemn colleagues. The past five days have been the first time all members have been present in Washington, D.C., since a government shutdown started on October 1. Instead of initiating productive legislative work, the chamber became embroiled in what some are calling “playground nonsense.”
Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.) summed up the sentiment, stating, “This is ridiculous playground nonsense.” He criticized fellow lawmakers for using the House as a personal platform for attention, saying, “People have done some egregious things. But I’ve just had enough of this back and forth nonsense.” Echoing this, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) described the week’s censure actions as “the biggest load of bulls—,” indicating the need for reform to prevent a single member’s actions from disrupting the entire floor.
The censure mechanism has become a tool that analysts warn could be misused for political agendas, especially as election season approaches. One official, requesting anonymity, expressed concern that a majority could target lawmakers in vulnerable races, turning censure into a weapon for political gain.
The current system allows any member to propose a censure, leading to a surge in privileged resolutions—five in total this week. This has sparked discussions about changing the rules, with one bipartisan proposal suggesting a shift from a simple majority to a 60% threshold for censures. However, experts like Jim Curry, a political science professor, remain skeptical. Curry pointed out that simply raising the threshold might not deter lawmakers from pursuing headlines through these resolutions.
Rep. Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) highlighted the retaliatory nature of the censure actions, saying, “Eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.” He noted that using the House floor to settle personal grievances undermines proper accountability processes. He suggested that accountability should follow due process, not a rush to headlines.
Lawmakers attribute the increase in dramatic gestures to various factors, including political tensions stemming from a prolonged government shutdown and individual desires for recognition. Rep. Mike Haridopolos (R-Fla.) remarked on the “pent-up frustration” following the shutdown, emphasizing the desire to address substantial issues such as rising material costs and healthcare. He cautioned that some members might misappropriate procedures to settle scores rather than focus on significant legislative responsibilities.
Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) criticized the media for amplifying this cycle of sensationalism, asserting that the attention these actions receive is “clickbait” and calling it “lame.”
Some lawmakers are advocating for a greater reliance on the House Ethics Committee to manage complaints about misconduct. Committee Chairman Michael Guest (R-Miss.) believes this could better discern which cases warrant censure, emphasizing the need for a clearer understanding of member conduct.
Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.), also part of the Ethics Committee, noted that alternative measures exist between censure and a full investigation. He acknowledged concerns about the committee’s speed but underscored the importance of informed decision-making in addressing behavior issues.
Several members voiced their frustrations regarding the diversion of attention from pressing legislative matters due to incessant focus on censure votes. Rep. Jim McGovern (R-Mass.) expressed exasperation that discussions often skew toward irrelevant issues, stating, “Issues of affordability are what I’m focused on.” In a similar vein, Rep. Brad Knott (R-S.C.) urged lawmakers to concentrate on broader issues that the American public cares about.
In light of these discussions, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) indicated that he is open to exploring reforms for the censure process. He mentioned that members from the conference have been sharing their thoughts, and there will be a deliberate approach to finding solutions.
This week has highlighted a significant shift in the way Congress conducts its business. As censure votes become more commonplace, concerns about their impact and misuse will likely continue to dominate conversations among lawmakers. It remains to be seen whether reforms will be enacted to restore decorum and focus back to vital legislative responsibilities.
"*" indicates required fields
