A conservative watchdog group has put New York Attorney General Letitia James in the hot seat with a formal bar complaint, alleging professional misconduct regarding her Norfolk, Virginia, mortgage. The Center to Advance Security in America (CASA) filed this complaint with the state’s Attorney Grievance Committee, claiming that James engaged in “illegal and dishonest conduct” tied to her mortgage dealings. This scrutiny comes on the heels of recently dismissed federal charges against her.
In their four-page grievance, CASA raises serious questions about James’ actions, citing potential violations of New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct, which are designed to uphold ethical standards among lawyers. Curtis Schube, the group’s director of research and policy, emphasized key ethical principles in the complaint. He stated, “Fraud, misrepresentation, honesty, and trustworthiness are all factors that the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly consider when weighing whether to discipline an attorney.” Schube called for a thorough investigation, asserting that if evidence supports the allegations, James should face disciplinary action.
The complaint surfaces right after a federal judge dismissed the legal actions against James and former FBI Director James Comey. This judge found the indictments flawed due to the involvement of an unqualified U.S. attorney. Although the bank fraud charges against James were dismissed, this does not mean she is entirely off the hook. The dismissal was made without prejudice, which allows the possibility of re-filing the charges in the future—a vulnerability that could loom over her career.
In a related response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the appointments within the Department of Justice, particularly after Judge Cameron Currie, a Clinton appointee, ruled on the legitimacy of the attorney in question, Lindsey Halligan. Leavitt expressed confidence in Halligan’s qualifications and indicated the DOJ’s intention to appeal the judge’s decision. She noted, “We believe the attorney in this case… is extremely qualified for this position, but she was in fact legally appointed.” This comment reflects the ongoing battle over authority and qualifications in high-profile legal cases.
The situation is complicated by the context of James’ charges. She allegedly falsified mortgage documents to secure a loan of $109,600 on her Virginia property and purportedly presented the residence as her principal home in 2023, despite holding a public office in New York. James has firmly denied any wrongdoing, attributing her issues to a mistake in documentation. “I never tried to deceive the lender,” she stated, suggesting the situation might be a simple error rather than an intentional act of deception.
As the legal landscape surrounding this case unfolds, the stakes remain high for James. With the bar complaint lodged and the potential for renewed legal scrutiny, she faces challenges that may have lasting implications for her political future.
"*" indicates required fields
