Michelle Obama is facing mounting criticism for her recent Instagram video, which featured her during a photoshoot. In the clip, her team is seen adjusting her wardrobe and styling her hair while she appears nonchalant about the whole affair. This comes just weeks after she lamented having a “glam team,” claiming that it made her life too easy during her time as First Lady. It’s a stark display of disconnect from the struggles many face.
In an interview with Robin Roberts for ABC, Obama openly complained about how demanding her public role was. She characterized her glam squad not as a luxury but a necessity, stating, “I didn’t really have that choice as First Lady, right? Every day, every time I was up, as we called it, you know, I was up for the public, and the days were long.” But this perspective raises questions for those who don’t live in such a privileged bubble. Most people work hard to maintain their own appearances without the comfort of a dedicated team to handle everything.
While voicing her frustrations, she seems to overlook the realities faced by everyday individuals. Many are compelled to dress themselves without stylists. Michelle’s complaints about needing assistance with her look resonate poorly against the backdrop of struggling families. They neither have funds for extravagant vacations on a $250 million yacht nor the resources to employ a glam team to meet their daily needs.
Furthermore, Obama injected race into the conversation, implying that beauty standards are inherently biased, especially for Black women. She explained, “As women of color, the way our hair naturally grows out of our head, it’s beautiful, but if we struggle to make it look like the standard, that means we are spending thousands of hours and lots of money straightening out what is naturally curly hair and that takes hours out of your life.” While her point holds merit about societal beauty norms, it also feels somewhat overshadowed by the privilege she enjoys.
Contrast Michelle Obama’s experience with that of Melania Trump, who faced a different set of challenges as First Lady. With unyielding scrutiny on her marriage and endless criticism directed at her accent and heritage, Melania’s journey was fraught with difficulty. She met invasive questions about her personal life and judgments on her public persona with notable poise. Despite the media’s relentless focus, Melania rarely complained. That steadfastness told its own story amidst harsh judgment, while her fashion choices were often ridiculed, unlike those of her predecessors.
The contrast between the two women’s experiences raises poignant debates about public perception, privilege, and the scrutiny each faced. While one shares her woes with a glam team, the other silently endures a barrage of criticism while maintaining a composed public image. In this polarized landscape, it’s evident that Michelle Obama’s recent tone-deafness may not sit well with many who recognize the divide in how different First Ladies have been treated.
This situation illustrates how public figures navigate the complexities of their roles while under constant observation. Michelle’s seemingly simple remarks reveal a broader disconnect. The reality remains that many individuals occupy lives filled with genuine challenges, far divorced from the luxuries of life in the White House. Underneath the glitz and glamor lies an expectation that resonates more deeply with the average American, who seeks authenticity over privilege.
"*" indicates required fields
