Laws surrounding medical obligations within the military landscape continue to pose significant questions, particularly concerning the COVID-19 vaccination mandate. Recent findings indicate that the Department of War has largely overlooked these concerns, raising doubts about legal compliance. The Department faces heavy scrutiny over its flouting of 10 U.S. Code § 1107a, which ensures individuals are informed of their option to accept or refuse medical products authorized for emergency use.
Despite an apparent acknowledgment from War Secretary Hegseth of the vaccine mandate’s unlawfulness, there remains a deafening silence regarding what specific laws were transgressed. “If something is considered unlawful, then a law or laws must have been violated,” the article posits. The insistence on accountability reflects a growing frustration among service members and veterans who question the legal grounding of their treatment.
A survey involving over 60 military personnel provides vital insights into the issue. An overwhelming 69 percent cited 10 U.S. Code § 1107a in their initial requests for exemptions from the vaccine. Yet, these requests were met with blanket denials. Around 71 percent of those appealing the denials reiterated this code, highlighting a troubling pattern of disregard. The suggestion is clear: somewhere in the chain of command, important laws were overlooked, raising the question of how many more submissions were ignored.
Two participants from the survey voiced their deep cynicism regarding the decision-making processes within the military. One pointedly stated that commanders seemed more focused on monetary interests than legal obligations. This perception of prioritizing self-interest over fidelity to military law betrays the expectations service members hold for their leaders. Terms like “sellouts in prison camp” evoke a stark image of betrayal, resonating deeply with notions of loyalty and duty.
Moreover, concerns about the health impacts of the vaccine have further aggravated frustrations. The alarming statistic that 92 percent of survey participants knew fellow service members believed they suffered physical harm from the COVID-19 vaccine speaks volumes. This sentiment echoes among military ranks, leading to feelings of betrayal and anger. “I feel absolutely betrayed,” one service member articulated, expressing a sentiment that many feel as they grapple with the consequences of their enforced compliance.
In this contentious environment, the looming questions persist. What specific laws did the Department of War break? Who should be held accountable? Service members and veterans await clarity, yet as time elapses, uncertainty reigns. They look to Secretary Hegseth for guidance. With many still bearing scars—both emotional and physical—brought on by decisions beyond their control, the demand for answers grows more urgent with each passing day. The clock is ticking, and the resolve for accountability is stronger than ever.
"*" indicates required fields
