The recent arrest of Mohammad Dawood Alokozay has ignited serious concern regarding national security and the vetting processes associated with the resettlement of Afghan nationals under the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome. Alokozay, an Afghan national admitted to the U.S. in September 2022, allegedly posted a video threatening violence and outlining plans to construct a car bomb, raising questions about the effectiveness of the screening protocols that allowed him entry into the country.
In a video that has drawn national attention, Alokozay expressed intentions to use a taxi for his attacks, declaring, “I’m going to kill anyone who opposes Afghans.” The statement, shared online, has prompted outrage and skepticism about how he was granted lawful permanent residency in the first place. Commentary from various sources, including commentator Benny Johnson, underscores sentiments of betrayal: “THIS is who Biden said was ‘thoroughly vetted.’ ONE OF THE BIGGEST LIES IN HISTORY.” Such assertions reflect a growing mistrust about the administration’s commitment to maintaining public safety.
The arrest occurred in Texas. While specifics about the intended attack remain elusive, the mention of Fort Worth as a potential target heightened concerns among law enforcement officials. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) acted swiftly, collaborating with the Texas Department of Public Safety and the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force. Their prompt response indicates the perceived urgency in addressing any threats to public safety, especially in light of another violent incident involving an Afghan national just days prior in Washington, D.C.
Alokozay’s admission to the U.S. under Operation Allies Welcome, a program created to support Afghan refugees following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, has become contentious. Despite being processed without disqualifying alerts at the time, his subsequent actions have raised profound doubts about the thoroughness of the vetting procedures. Critics argue that this scenario exemplifies a systemic flaw, hinting at a broader issue concerning how Afghan evacuees were assessed.
The lack of adequate screening appears highlighted further by a fatal shooting involving another Afghan national, Rahmanullah Lakanwal. Also admitted under the same resettlement program, Lakanwal reportedly opened fire on National Guard troops, resulting in the death of Specialist Sarah Beckstrom and leaving another servicemember critically injured. Such events compound the mounting scrutiny of the vetting process, with law enforcement confirming that neither individual had previously raised red flags during their screenings.
Transgressions like those exhibited by Alokozay and Lakanwal call into question the integrity of the Operation Allies Welcome database, as noted in a DHS Inspector General report that highlights significant errors that hinder reliable identity verification. The risks associated with such oversights extend beyond individual cases; they reflect a broader vulnerability for national security as various individuals enter the country without proper checks.
As a result of these incidents, Alokozay is currently detained under an immigration hold, signaling a likely path toward deportation following state proceedings. While the full details surrounding the potential bomb construction remain undisclosed, the visual references stated to feature in his video were described as “direct, violent, and deeply concerning” by a DHS official. Such explicit threats pose a significant challenge for law enforcement and foster a climate of fear among communities.
Alokozay’s case has provoked intense political discourse and prompted official calls for a reevaluation of immigration policies moving forward. Influential voices, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have emphasized the immediate need for heightened screening protocols for individuals from high-risk regions. The crux of the argument rests on ensuring that potential threats do not slip through the cracks of the immigration system.
As investigations continue into Alokozay and Lakanwal, various congressional oversight requests are underway, diving deeper into the failures of the vetting process. Internal documents obtained by investigators suggest significant issues in documentation and staffing, further complicating the screening of evacuees in the wake of the hurried evacuation from Afghanistan.
The ramifications of these events resonate within federal agencies tasked with counterterrorism. Unnamed officials have expressed increasing frustration, stating that the current situation feels like “handling one fire after another.” The narrative that these individuals were merely “sleeper cells” is dismantled when assessed against their blatant actions and the rapidly unfolding nature of these incidents.
As Mohammad Dawood Alokozay sits in detention, awaiting further legal proceedings, the case exemplifies a concerning reality for many. The statement from a former Homeland Security analyst resonates deeply: “The American people deserve better than an immigration system that gambles with their safety.” The underlying fear is clear—if threats like Alokozay’s can proliferate unnoticed, what does that say about the overall vetting and monitoring processes that shape national immigration policy?
"*" indicates required fields
