MSNBC is undergoing a significant transformation as it rebrands to MS NOW, shedding its former identity while keeping its core ethos intact. The new name lacks the weight of NBC News connections and symbolizes both a loss and an attempt at renewal. The wit in the rebranding choice is palpable; the acronym can humorously be interpreted as a nod to the network’s past incompetence. Yet, MSNBC plans to stick closely to its established formula of presenting news with a distinctly progressive slant.
The impending transition comes amid a notable decline in viewership, with ratings down 34 percent over the past year. In contrast, competitors like CNN have experienced smaller drops, while Fox News is witnessing a resurgence in audience engagement. Nevertheless, MSNBC’s leadership seems undeterred, rolling out a $20 million rebranding campaign designed to affirm its commitment to what they describe as patriotic values, albeit through a left-leaning lens.
The irony of this campaign is striking. To tug at the heartstrings of an audience weary from political chaos, the network has opted for a visual representation of inclusivity that appears superficial. They hired black actors for promotional spots featuring the network’s predominantly white rotating cast. This move appears as if they are attempting to cultivate a sense of diverse representation while simultaneously reinforcing a legacy of tokenism. “Rachel Maddow intoning the preamble to the U.S. Constitution” alongside “Maya Angelou reciting her poem ‘Human Family’” serves as an attempt to sand down an overly polished image that many critics suggest still reflects inherent biases.
This contrast between the carefully curated representation in advertisements and the reality of their lineup is a critical point to unpack. The campaign involved using professional actors who are presented without disclosure of their status to emphasize racial and social issues that the average viewer might resonate with. One must ask: does this tactic betray the same misunderstandings of race that the network claims to combat? The faces shown are not the voices of those they represent, which could come off as disingenuous at best and exploitative at worst.
Compounding the irony is the recent firing of prominent host Joy Reid, who spoke candidly about the difficulties faced by minority journalists in a hostile media landscape. Rachel Maddow herself criticized the network in the aftermath of Reid’s dismissal, implying that the leadership’s choices carried racial implications. This underscores a disconnect; while the execs seem eager to rebrand under the banner of racial justice, they fail to recognize the optics of eliminating influential minority voices.
Indeed, the new promotional materials highlight patriotic sentiments, yet they do so through a lens that risks alienating the very base it aims to attract. The network appears to be trying to unify a fragmented audience by pitching an idea of shared values, while many viewers might find this approach lacking authenticity. The brief screen time afforded to black co-hosts in the material only amplifies this narrative misstep, suggesting that genuine engagement with racial diversity is secondary to market strategy.
The campaign raises questions about the direction of MS NOW. While it may present a fresh coat of paint to an aging model, the substance behind the rebranding remains rooted in corporate attempts to recuperate lost viewers. As mixed messages surface regarding diversity and representation, the transition could be perceived as a problematic attempt to clear a path forward—a path that continues to overlook meaningful change in favor of perception.
The essence of MSNBC seems indelibly tied to its identity even as it strives for a new direction. In doing so, it risks perpetuating the very issues it claims to confront. This rebranding exercise instead serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between media representation and social justice. As long as MS NOW operates within its current framework, it faces the challenge of convincing an audience hungry for authenticity that it’s genuinely committed to those principles—before they roll their eyes once again at the latest marketing gimmick.
"*" indicates required fields
