Social media is often a mixed bag, but one tweet recently stood out for its stark sarcasm: “People are really disgusting, these are human beings, native Americans should have deported all us white folk!!” This commentary, posted by @EricLDaugh, is not merely playful banter. It highlights serious and ongoing issues regarding Native American history and rights in modern America. The message resonates amid a rising discourse on identity, belonging, and power dynamics in this country.
This tweet underscores a harsh reality—an evolving battle over who is included in the American narrative. The Trump administration, from its inception through its recent initiatives, has pushed a historical narrative that glorifies conquest while neglecting the obligations owed to Indigenous peoples. This trend is concerning for Native leaders and advocacy groups who perceive it as a blatant distortion of history that aids hostile actions against Native communities.
Since 2017, the administration’s portrayal of Indigenous history largely revolves around the idea of Manifest Destiny. This revision, critics insist, enables policies that threaten citizenship for tribal members and permits unjust detentions. “The struggle over history, from Wounded Knee to Thanksgiving to ICE detentions,” stated a joint message from legal advocates, “is not a debate about the past. It is a struggle over who defines America and whose humanity matters.” This perspective reveals a deep ideological rift regarding historical narratives in the U.S.
This ideological battle manifests in the actions of federal agencies. For example, in 2023, the Department of Homeland Security shared the painting American Progress alongside a message about honoring homeland values. The artwork portrays an angelic figure advancing westward while Indigenous peoples fade into the margins. Critics argue that it symbolizes a federal endorsement of erasure, aligning government actions with a troubling legacy.
The stakes of this conflict are heightened. Reports from 2025 indicate that members of recognized tribes, such as the Navajo Nation, have faced detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) despite having proper tribal identification. Such situations exemplify a disturbing trend where valid legal status is discarded, endangering the lives of Native individuals. As noted, “Native Americans born in the U.S. are U.S. citizens, and ICE cannot detain or deport them for immigration violations,” a statement from the ACLU reflecting ongoing legal confusion sparked by recent executive orders.
The executive order issued on January 20, 2025, aimed to limit citizenship guarantees for children of undocumented immigrants while referencing historical legal cases involving Native Americans. This sparked fears of renewed scrutiny on Indigenous identities, stoking anxiety among tribal communities. Legal experts assure that this order lacks the power to alter Native birthright citizenship, yet the uncertainty complicates the lives of Indigenous citizens, prompting the ACLU to launch a campaign to promote awareness of legal rights.
The enforcement actions shape a broader, troubling trend regarding historiography and policy. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s support for medals awarded to soldiers in the Wounded Knee Massacre reinforces a damaging narrative that normalizes violence against Native Americans. “A new vision for the United States is being forced into place,” warned one critic. “One rooted not in liberty or justice, but in subjugation and the quiet normalization and acceptance of fascism.” This critique echoes ongoing struggles against systemic injustices faced by Native people.
Political maneuvers play a significant role as well. The Heritage Foundation is working on Project 2025, a blueprint for restructuring federal agencies under a possible Trump administration reinstitution. This plan threatens to dismantle civil rights protections, pushing agendas that seek to enforce immigration policies even in traditionally protected environments like schools and hospitals. The ACLU likens this restructuring to forcing citizens into impossible decisions, echoing broader fears of systemic disenfranchisement.
The troubling narrative is compounded when federal entities disregard tribal identification documents, leading to unjust detentions. The American Immigration Council has confirmed cases where law enforcement did not recognize tribal credentials, revealing a systemic issue of racial profiling within immigration policy. “We’re seeing racial profiling turned into policy,” a legal expert cautioned, emphasizing that this goes beyond ignorance—it is a deliberate strategy.
As these challenges mount, Native communities are not standing idle. Events like the National Day of Mourning in Plymouth, Massachusetts, and gatherings such as the Indigenous Peoples Sunrise Gathering on Alcatraz Island affirm their resilience. These events seek to honor history while demanding recognition of ongoing injustices, including honoring treaties and resisting the government’s attempts to redefine Native identities.
The urgent need to confront this narrative cannot be overstated, especially when the very notion of citizenship is at stake. History illustrates an American landscape marked by struggle, yet Native Americans continue to confront challenges posed by a government seemingly willing to rewrite its own story.
Bringing us back to that sharp tweet: “Native Americans should have deported all us white folk.” This biting statement draws direct attention to the current realities facing Native American communities, highlighting a government that chooses to forget the past while justifying harmful policies under the guise of historical amnesia. It calls into question not just the representation of Indigenous history, but the fundamental treatment of Native peoples today against a backdrop of selective memory and governmental oversight.
"*" indicates required fields
