In the landscape of American politics, the New York City mayoral race stands out—not for its intense excitement, but for a surprising lack of urgency among voters. While news outlets trumpet the stakes, many New Yorkers are adopting a nonchalant attitude, with some citizens even describing the election as unimportant in the grand scheme of their daily lives.
On a recent tour through the boroughs, varying opinions reflected a complex landscape. Al, a Metropolitan Transit Authority employee, dismissed the idea of free public transportation proposed by Democrat Socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani, remarking, “It’s stupid. It’s never going to happen anyway. My bosses like money.” His disinterest encapsulates the sentiments of many who are not swayed by political rhetoric but rather focus on practicality.
Derrick, a hospitality worker in Midtown, revealed a puzzling political alignment. He criticized current Mayor Eric Adams and credited socialist former Mayor Bill de Blasio with doing a better job, yet he intends to support Curtis Sliwa. His reasoning, “we know Curtis and he loves New York City,” illustrates a connection to local heroes rather than party lines. Voters like Derrick challenge the notion that their preferences can be neatly categorized.
In Staten Island, Cindy and Denise echoed similar sentiments at Steiney’s Pub. They reflected on their experiences with various mayors, concluding that life in the city moves beyond the spectacle of elections. Cindy succinctly stated, “It just doesn’t matter that much. Life happens here, not up with the kings who run stuff.” This captures a prevalent feeling in neighborhoods far from the political epicenter, where the day-to-day exists outside the glamour and drama of campaign season.
Uber driver Naveed added another layer of perspective. Hailing from Pakistan, he shared that his community was buzzing with enthusiasm for Mamdani, igniting contrasts between local apathy and community excitement. His laughter highlighted a disconnect: while some New Yorkers shrug off the election’s importance, others are deeply engaged in politics, particularly within their cultural enclaves.
A visit to Bay Ridge revealed yawning gaps in candidate visibility and engagement. Longtime locals Steve and Suzanne couldn’t recall seeing Andrew Cuomo in their neighborhood, a stark contrast to Curtis Sliwa’s frequent visits. Their observations underscore a perceived disconnection on the part of significant political figures with the community, revealing what Steve termed “political malpractice.”
Throughout these encounters, a central theme emerged: residents embody a resilience and a core identity that persists despite changes in political leadership. Many expressed skepticism about Mamdani’s ability to affect substantive change, recalling their experiences under de Blasio’s administration. “New York is still standing,” they observed, suggesting that no candidate, regardless of their platform, can alter the city’s fundamental character.
Despite an atmosphere of nonchalance and detachment among many voters, the diversity of opinions and experiences reflects the complex nature of New York City politics. While media may portray the race as a thrilling spectacle, many residents find themselves unaffected by the unfolding drama, embracing a pragmatic view of their city and its leadership. Ultimately, they can still keep their heads down, rise early, and diligently work towards their own version of the American dream. In essence, for New Yorkers, this may indeed be “the It is what it is election,” as they navigate the complexities of their city with a steadfast sense of identity.
"*" indicates required fields
