The recent removal of the “Not One More Report” from the Department of Justice website is a troubling indication of how bureaucratic decisions can directly affect vulnerable populations, particularly among Indigenous communities. This report, created under the Not Invisible Act of 2020, documented the alarming crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous people (MMIP) and laid bare systemic failures that have long contributed to this epidemic. The quiet deletion of such a critical document has sparked bipartisan outrage, as tribal advocates and lawmakers express concern over the repercussions of this action.
The timeline surrounding the removal places the Trump administration at the forefront, having acted shortly after issuing an executive order aimed at eliminating what it labels as “gender ideology.” Critics argue that this move misconstrues the report’s fundamental purpose while undermining the sovereignty of tribal nations. The DOJ asserts compliance with this order, but many question whether this rationale sufficiently justifies the disregard for tribal safety and rights.
Key figures, including Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, have condemned the report’s removal as not only an affront to tribal communities but also as a barrier to gaining insights into the MMIP crisis. Her statement underscores the consensus among lawmakers that without the report, understanding the full scope of violence affecting Indigenous peoples becomes nearly impossible. “Erasing this commission’s report…is outrageous,” she remarked, a sentiment echoed by other lawmakers who are calling for transparency and accountability from the DOJ.
In addition, Senator Lisa Murkowski highlighted the necessity of access to information, saying, “If we don’t know what we don’t know, it’s pretty tough to say it’s a problem.” This comment reflects a prevailing frustration among those who understand that knowledge is key to addressing violence against Indigenous women. Likewise, Senator Tina Smith pointed out the importance of recognizing tribal nations not as just another constituency but as sovereign entities that require unique attention. Such perspectives emphasize the failure of the current administration to acknowledge the distinct needs of these communities.
The report’s implications extend beyond symbolic significance. Built upon over 250 testimonies from Native families and law enforcement, it provided actionable recommendations to address the crisis of MMIP. Removing it is not just a bureaucratic issue; it undermines the very foundation of accountability necessary for change. Carmen Harvie, a commission member, poignantly expressed the urgency in this matter, stating, “This is to help people. To take that away is very disrespectful to our people, especially coming from our government.” Her words encapsulate the sentiment among those fighting for justice and recognition.
The crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous women is a longstanding issue that has persisted for generations, as noted by State Representative Ronald Stewart. The challenges are deeply rooted in systemic failures of law enforcement and legal systems, often compounded by jurisdictional confusion. As these communities strive for solutions, the removal of such vital resources raises significant concerns about the future of justice for Indigenous people.
Public reaction has brought further attention to the issue. Many expressed disbelief over the administration’s decision, linking it to historical injustices faced by Indigenous communities. Calls for immediate restoration of the report highlight the discontent simmering beneath the surface, as advocates demand that tribal safety be prioritized and not subject to political maneuvering.
While community-led initiatives within tribal nations attempt to fill the gap left by the report’s absence, there is an urgency for federal support to ensure that these efforts do not falter. The long-term effects of this removal could lead to an even deeper divide in resources available to Native communities, making it more challenging to address pre-existing inequalities.
With the DOJ remaining silent on a concrete plan to restore the report, the outlook becomes increasingly concerning. Advocacy groups have resorted to alternative means to share its findings, indicating a desperate need to keep critical data accessible to those most affected. However, the absence of this report from the federal platform raises alarms regarding the priorities of those in power and the ongoing struggles faced by Indigenous populations navigating a complex landscape of justice and recognition.
This situation warrants careful attention. As the conversation evolves, it remains essential to remember the history, the voices of those affected, and the dire need for action to rectify the injustices they face. The “Not One More Report” was designed to shine a light on the critical issue of MMIP. Without it, the path to justice becomes obscured. The call for restoration is not just a political one; it represents the urgent need to address the legacy of violence against Indigenous communities and restore their rightful place within the conversation of justice reform.
"*" indicates required fields
