Recent reports have shed light on the background of Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the Afghan national accused of shooting National Guard members near the White House. This incident has raised significant questions regarding the involvement of U.S. agencies, particularly the CIA, in the training and support of armed units during the war in Afghanistan.
According to CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Lakanwal previously served in the Kandahar Strike Force, a special forces unit operating under the National Directorate of Security (NDS) in Afghanistan. The NDS, established with CIA support, acted as the backbone of intelligence operations in the country. The unit, known colloquially as the “Zero Units,” was primarily made up of Afghan nationals trained to carry out clandestine missions. Reports indicate that these forces received their training and equipment directly from the CIA, underscoring the depth of collaboration between U.S. agencies and local forces.
One striking revelation is the identity badge that has surfaced online, which purportedly identifies Lakanwal as a member of the Kandahar Strike Force, designated the “03” unit. This badge features references to “Firebase Gecko,” a base linked to CIA operations in Kandahar. The specific mention of Firebase Gecko adds weight to the narrative surrounding the nature of Lakanwal’s involvement with U.S. forces. However, CBS News has yet to verify the authenticity of this ID badge.
What makes the Kandahar Strike Force particularly notable is its reputation among Afghan military and intelligence circles. A former Afghan general described the “03” unit as one of the most capable and professional groups, directly trained by the CIA. Their operations, reportedly sanctioned and directed by the CIA, illustrate a complex relationship between the U.S. and Afghan forces, where local agents were groomed for missions with considerable American oversight.
The linkage of Lakanwal’s act of violence to his prior association with a U.S.-backed unit raises serious concerns. Some commentators have noted that it reflects a troubling legacy of the war that saw U.S. resources funneling into forces that, in some cases, have turned against American interests post-withdrawal. The incident spotlights the risks associated with collaborating with foreign nationals in military operations and prompts a broader discussion about accountability and the potential repercussions of such alliances.
The CIA’s engagement with the Zero Units, characterized by direct payment and oversight, suggests a calculated strategy during a tumultuous engagement in Afghanistan. The ramifications of these connections continue to unfold, particularly as individuals like Lakanwal are implicated in violence against American personnel. This situation exemplifies a perilous intersection of foreign policy, military strategy, and the unpredictable outcomes that can emerge from partnerships formed in the heat of war.
As this story develops, it remains critical to scrutinize the layers of influence and control the CIA had over Afghan units during the conflict. The dynamics between the U.S. and its former allies will require careful examination to fully understand the implications of such collaborations on both national security and international relations.
"*" indicates required fields
