Support is coalescing in Washington around a renewed effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly referred to as Obamacare. Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona is leading the charge with proposed legislation that calls for a complete repeal of what he terms the “unaffordable” and outdated law. His push comes after the failure of previous attempts to replace the ACA in the Senate.
In a tweet on Tuesday, Biggs emphasized the urgency of this movement: “Time to repeal the Unaffordable Care Act.” He advocated for an approach favored by former President Donald Trump, suggesting resources be directed to Americans directly rather than funneled through large insurance companies. By opting for Trump’s proposal, Biggs argues that the focus shifts back to the people.
This momentum follows the collapse of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) last week. A senior official from the White House pointed out a strong current of sentiment among House Republicans favoring a simple repeal, especially in light of the recent failure of the AHCA. The administration seems prepared to partner with lawmakers from both chambers on Biggs’ repeal-only legislation.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a report in July 2023 that stated a full repeal of the ACA, without a replacement, could potentially decrease federal deficits by up to $473 billion over the next ten years. This estimate takes into account spending cuts and the elimination of subsidies currently provided to insurers under the ACA. However, it also warned that up to 32 million Americans could lose their insurance during the same time frame.
Lawmakers like Biggs argue that the rise in premiums and lack of care access in rural areas indicate a need for new legislation. “The American people were sold a false bill of goods,” he stated during a recent speech. He pointed out that the ACA was supposed to reduce costs and broaden access. Instead, it has led to significant premium increases and diminished choices in many states.
The issue is pressing. In states such as Alaska, West Virginia, and Wyoming, premiums are expected to double if temporary ACA subsidies, implemented during the pandemic, are allowed to lapse. Research from the Kaiser Family Foundation indicates that a subsidized enrollee’s premium could soar from $888 in 2025 to $1,904 in 2026, marking a staggering 114% increase.
Compounding the situation, a May 2023 KFF survey showed that nearly half of the 24 million Americans relying on these subsidies are registered Republicans. This statistic has not gone unnoticed by GOP lawmakers eager to respond to their constituents’ struggles. One House Republican aide mentioned to Newsmax that these premium spikes “are crushing working families, especially in red states.” The current healthcare system rewards insurers while punishing everyday taxpayers.
This renewed call for repeal has also rekindled interest in a healthcare plan previously proposed by Trump. Although details were sparse at the time, Trump emphasized principles such as patient-centered care, price transparency, and direct payments to citizens rather than insurance companies. Advocates believe this approach would mitigate bureaucratic waste and ensure that support reaches those who truly need it.
“Why would we keep propping up a failed system when we can put money straight into the hands of the people who need it?” Biggs asked during a radio appearance, emphasizing alternatives like Medicare Advantage and health savings accounts as potential models that could flourish with less government interference.
While the White House appears open to discussions, they have yet to solidify a plan. The press secretary noted that the administration is ready to collaborate with lawmakers on repeal efforts. However, even those in favor of repeal acknowledge the challenges ahead. Senate Republicans are deeply divided, with some advising caution and others favoring the retention of popular ACA provisions, such as protections for individuals with preexisting conditions.
Democratic opposition to this repeal effort is significant. Representative Ritchie Torres of New York criticized the move as an “unconditional surrender” that would leave millions without coverage as premiums spike. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has vowed to prevent any repeal legislation from advancing, labeling it “destructive and heartless.”
For fiscal conservatives, the figures speak for themselves. Extending enhanced ACA subsidies could cost the government up to $50 billion annually. At a time when federal debt hovers around $37 trillion, lawmakers like Biggs argue that this expenditure is unsustainable. He remarked during a committee hearing that Congress seems hesitant to cut spending or balance the budget while simultaneously disbursing billions to insurance companies under a failing system.
Public sentiment on healthcare remains divided. Recent polls show President Biden’s approval rating for handling health care below 40%. Although repealing the ACA is politically risky due to fears of coverage loss, conservative lawmakers believe the moment is right to challenge the status quo on fiscal grounds and public discontent with the overall system.
Though not yet universally supported, this fresh push for repeal holds significant momentum. In an era of political paralysis, critics of the ACA are advocating a straightforward argument: dismantle a costly program, eliminate the middlemen, and restore control over health care to the individuals who need it. The question now is how many lawmakers will align with that vision. As Biggs asserted in his recent tweet: “GET GOING! Don’t forget that we have a mandate to do this.”
"*" indicates required fields
