Count Del. Stacey Plaskett, a Democrat representing the U.S. Virgin Islands, as another casualty amid the party’s attempt to pin the scandal surrounding Jeffrey Epstein on Republicans. Last week, it came to light that she exchanged texts with Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. At that hearing, Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former lawyer, was testifying. These revelations are part of documents recently released by the House Oversight Committee, first through a selective leak by Democrats followed by a broader release from Republicans.
The initial leak hinted at a potential connection between Trump and Epstein in terms of knowledge about the victims of Epstein’s trafficking. However, Trump has consistently claimed he only knew Epstein through social circles and severed ties in the early 2000s. Within the documents, a redacted name was eventually confirmed to belong to Virginia Giuffre, a known Epstein victim who insisted that Trump had no involvement in the misconduct associated with Epstein. While Plaskett and her party moved quickly to leverage the troubled history of Epstein against Trump, they appear to be miscalculating who they might implicate as they continue their strategy.
An article in the Washington Post revealed yet another twist, stating that the known sex offender had been texting Plaskett while watching Cohen’s hearing in real-time. The messages indicated that Epstein was providing her live updates about Cohen’s testimony. “Cohen brought up RONA – keeper of the secrets,” Epstein texted, in reference to Trump’s former assistant Rhona Graff. Plaskett responded, asking for clarification, signaling her readiness to question Cohen.
Despite being a non-voting member of the House, the implications of her actions are weighty. Plaskett not only represents the district where Epstein’s private island, often referred to in infamy, is located, but she also served as an impeachment manager during Trump’s second trial in 2021. The consequences came swiftly; House Republicans moved a resolution to censure Plaskett for her communications with Epstein, alleging she received guidance from him with the intent to undermine Trump.
Although the effort to censure her narrowly failed, it marked a significant point in the ongoing fallout. Some Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, have also found themselves ensnared in Epstein-related inquiries. In a particularly damaging moment, Jeffries was confronted on the House floor for soliciting meetings and donations from Epstein even after his conviction as a sex offender.
This situation raises questions about the strategy of linking Epstein to Trump. The Democrats have yet to present substantial evidence that ties the former president to wrongdoing. Instead, the documents continue to reflect poorly on members within their own party. As Congress voted to release more documents, it remains to be seen what additional links may come to light.
In pursuit of this narrative, Democrats are becoming entangled in a web of their own making. Rather than discrediting their opposition, they are uncovering connections that may lead back to themselves. In attempting to place Trump at the center of the Epstein scandal, they have inadvertently invited scrutiny that could have lasting repercussions for their party’s credibility. As investigations unfold, it’s increasingly clear that they may have miscalculated the fallout from their own tactics, and it’s likely to generate more embarrassment than triumph.
"*" indicates required fields
