A recent undercover video has exposed alarming admissions from Steven Putansu, a director at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The O’Keefe Media Group released footage showing Putansu discussing a secretive initiative within the GAO aimed at countering the newly appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The video highlights potential breaches of federal law, including the unauthorized removal of public records and theft of government property.
Putansu openly admitted that GAO staff took actions to “steal and back up” federal vaccine data. This claim points to possible violations of serious legal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2071, which addresses the unauthorized removal or destruction of public records, and 18 U.S.C. § 641, which deals with theft of government property. He also indicated that their actions could implicate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for accessing and copying government data without proper authorization.
“We’ve stolen and backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government,” Putansu said, indicating a deliberate effort to safeguard data that had been deleted under Kennedy’s direction. This confession raises significant questions regarding the GAO’s integrity and the lengths to which individuals might go to oppose an administration’s directives.
Moreover, Putansu criticized what he referred to as the “vaccine deniers” within the Department of Health and Human Services. He described a scenario where the actions of the HHS could potentially worsen healthcare across the nation. “It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control,” he insisted. His comments highlight a deep-seated frustration with the current management of public health information.
This incident showcases a collision of differing ideologies within government agencies, particularly surrounding public health and vaccine policy. The revelations from Putansu’s conversation expose how some bureaucrats may undermine the very processes meant to uphold public trust in health guidance. This behavior raises critical concerns regarding accountability and transparency of federal operations.
The implications of this video stretch far beyond the GAO. It signals a troubling precedent where federal employees feel compelled to take matters into their own hands, bypassing established protocols and legal frameworks. Such actions jeopardize public trust and challenge the rule of law that governs federal office responsibilities.
The O’Keefe Media Group’s release of this footage has the potential to provoke a broader investigation into the practices of the GAO and the management of federal records. As these events unfold, the focus will rightly be on ensuring accountability and safeguarding the integrity of government data against misuse or mismanagement.
In summary, the admissions made by Steven Putansu could point to significant breaches of trust and legality within the GAO. The undercover video sheds light on actions taken to resist the policies of HHS under RFK Jr. It also raises broader questions about how far civil servants will go to protect their views on public health amidst shifting political landscapes.
"*" indicates required fields
