Tom Steyer’s entry into California’s gubernatorial race has ignited a firestorm, particularly with Katie Porter, who has been vocal in her critiques of the billionaire. Porter, who previously accepted substantial contributions—over $16,000—from Steyer, publicly slammed him for supposedly fighting against “the very industries he got rich helping grow.” Her bold declaration, “I call bullsh–,” showcases the tension brewing in this crowded race.
Renowned for her progressive stances, Porter’s credibility is now under scrutiny. A seasoned Democratic strategist remarked on her situation, stating, “Katie Porter is the ultimate hypocrite,” and adding that her handling of the campaign has been plagued with blunders, making her a liability for the Democrats. This criticism underscores a growing sentiment among some party insiders who are reevaluating her viability as a candidate.
Steyer’s campaign promises to tackle corporate interests, particularly in oil and tobacco, stand in stark contrast to his financial history. Critics, including fellow candidates like Betty Yee, argue that his wealth and past political failures—he previously tried to buy the presidency—cast doubt on his sincerity. Yee expressed that the governorship would not serve as “his consolation prize,” hinting at the uphill battle he may face in winning over constituents wary of his financial prowess.
Porter’s approach to the media hasn’t helped her cause either. In a recent CBS interview, after being pressed on the necessity of garnering votes from Trump supporters, Porter reacted defensively, leading to a stilted exchange. This incident, coupled with allegations regarding her treatment of staff, adds layers of complication to her candidacy. Reports of her lashing out at staff members and her dismissive response during interviews raise concerns about her leadership style.
With a host of other candidates—including notable figures like Antonio Villaraigosa and Xavier Becerra—Porter’s commitment to the campaign will be tested. As competition intensifies, the ramifications of her past dealings with Steyer and her contentious persona may play critical roles in shaping the outcome of the race. The dynamics within the Democratic Party in California appear to be as fraught as the stakes, with more challengers ready to capitalize on any missteps.
As the campaign unfolds, voters will be observing closely. The juxtaposition of campaign declarations and personal history will influence perceptions and decisions in a pivotal election year.
"*" indicates required fields
