A new report sheds light on the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, raising significant questions about the FBI’s role in the events leading up to the attack. The focus centers on the alleged shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, whose transformation from a supporter of Trump to a violent adversary taps into deeper societal concerns about radicalization.
Miranda Devine of The New York Post highlights troubling details of how Crooks gained access to a rooftop in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he fired shots that not only grazed Trump but also led to the tragic death of Corey Comperatore and injuries to others. The fact that Crooks managed to reach an elevated position poses serious questions about security lapses within the agencies responsible for protecting the former president.
The investigation revealed that the FBI and Secret Service have yet to provide a comprehensive account of their actions. A source discovered that crucial elements of Crooks’ online activities from 2020 onward were omitted from official documentation. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the effectiveness of federal agencies in monitoring and intervening with individuals who exhibit dangerous behaviors.
What stands out from the report is Crooks’ drastic ideological shift. Initially, he backed Trump fervently, even describing him as “the literal definition of Patriotism.” However, following the pandemic, his online persona morphed into a figure of radical rhetoric. This shift raises intriguing questions: what catalyzed this change? The patterns of his social media activity indicate a troubling obsession with political violence, evidenced by posts calling for extreme actions against Democratic lawmakers and expressing disdain for conservative outlets like Fox News.
Crooks’ digital footprint extends across multiple platforms, including YouTube, Snapchat, and Quora, where he expressed a wide range of sentiments, culminating in violent anti-Trump rhetoric by early 2020. His usage of one alias, “Rod Swanson,” reveals a disturbing interest in exploring various identities, including a “furry” persona and adopting radical gender ideology. The use of “they/them” pronouns in his communications, along with fetish-oriented art, adds another layer to his complex character and ideologies.
The connection between Crooks’ once vehement support for Trump and his later violent expressions emphasizes a trend within political discourse—a disillusionment that can escalate into extremism. As more details emerge, they will hopefully bring clarity to how such radical shifts can foster violence and challenge the security protocols intended to prevent them.
Stay tuned, as this story is still developing, and as it unfolds, it could prove pivotal in discussions about national security and the accountability of federal agencies.
"*" indicates required fields
