Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent highlighted significant differences between the Trump and Biden administrations during a recent appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” He emphasized how efforts to combat inflation and reduce the budget deficit are shaping economic conditions today. Bessent remarked, “We inherited a mess. It was the worst inflation in 40 or 50 years,” setting the stage for a direct contrast between the two presidencies.
During the discussion, co-host Willie Geist questioned Bessent about the impacts of Trump’s tariff policies on consumer prices. Bessent argued that tariffs have ultimately benefitted consumers by helping reduce deficit spending. He cited a study from MIT, noting that “42 percent of the great inflation [under Biden] was caused by the big deficit spending.” This underscores a critical argument that as deficit spending decreases, inflation is likely to follow suit.
Under Biden, inflation soared to 9.1 percent in June 2022, the highest level in four decades. This rise was driven by large spending packages, such as the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan and the $1 trillion Inflation Reduction Act, both of which contributed to an alarming deficit that reached $1.38 trillion in 2022 and continued to grow in subsequent years. Bessent’s comments point to a troubling fiscal landscape during Biden’s term, where the deficit ballooned to $1.83 trillion last year and was projected to hit $1.9 trillion in early 2025.
However, recent data indicates a reversal in this pattern under the Trump administration, where the federal deficit fell despite previous projections. For fiscal year 2025, total revenue surged to a record $5.23 trillion, representing a significant boost of over $300 billion from the previous year, a rise attributed partially to tariff revenue and an expanding economy. This fiscal discipline is critical, especially as inflation under Trump has remained around 3 percent, allowing wages to grow at a pace not seen during much of Biden’s tenure.
Bessent articulated a clear approach to addressing affordability: managing price increases while enhancing real working-class wages. He stated, “There are two ways to address affordability… If you keep prices under control or bring them down … and wages go through that line, that’s when Americans are going to be feeling good again.” This perspective captures a fundamental economic principle: improving living standards hinges on effective wage growth and restrained price increases. Bessent underscored that the upcoming November elections would be deeply influenced by these factors.
Geist pointed out that recent off-year elections suggested that Democrats successfully framed the affordability issue in their favor, a tactic reminiscent of challenges faced in Republican politics during past economic slowdowns. Bessent’s comparison to Ronald Reagan’s early years in the 1980s is striking. Reagan faced similar inflationary pressures with rates above 9 percent after the Carter administration, ultimately pushing for broad tax cuts that contributed to a significant economic recovery. Inflation fell to 3.8 percent by 1982, and the economy flourished through the mid-1980s. Bessent suggests a parallel narrative today, as Trump pursues fiscal strategies that may lead to improved conditions.
Further emphasizing this fiscal turnaround, Kevin Hassett, director of the president’s National Economic Council, confirmed that the reduction in the deficit is noteworthy. He pointed out that the improvement isn’t solely due to tariff revenue but also reflects a substantial increase in income taxes resulting from rising incomes. As revenues climb alongside a decreasing deficit, the current economic climate presents different challenges and opportunities compared to the last several years.
In summary, Bessent’s comments on the MSNBC program lay out a compelling case for the economic strategies employed under Trump, particularly surrounding tariffs and spending control. The contrasts with the Biden administration’s fiscal policies are stark, especially regarding inflation and deficit dynamics. Whether these trends will continue to develop favorably as election season approaches remains to be seen, but the dialogue on affordability is set to take center stage.
"*" indicates required fields
