The recent decision by President Donald Trump to propose ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somali immigrants is stirring significant reaction across the nation. A particular tweet captures the tension perfectly: “Muslims and Arabs are now bragging that Somalia is ‘heaven on Earth’… GREAT! So GO BACK… We don’t want a single solitary Somali living among us.” Such remarks signify a growing pushback against the Somali community in Minnesota, which hosts the largest concentration of Somalis in the United States.
Trump’s claim that Minnesota has become a “hub of fraudulent money laundering” and his suggestion that “Somali gangs are terrorizing the people” adds fuel to the fire. He argues that these issues justify his decision to end TPS for hundreds of Somali nationals. However, there’s a critical distinction here—the authority to end TPS rests not with the president but with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a point clarified by legal experts.
The TPS for Somalia was enacted in 1991 in response to the civil war and health crises back home, allowing roughly 700 eligible Somali nationals to live and work legally in the U.S. Currently, about 430 of those TPS holders reside in Minnesota, where the community has thrived despite ongoing challenges.
Certain supporters of Trump cite high-profile fraud cases, such as the “Feeding Our Future” scandal, involving numerous Somalis accused of misappropriating COVID-related funds. Among them, 57 are already convicted. GOP House Speaker Lisa Demuth stated, “Any individual involved… should be charged, held accountable, and swiftly deported if they are not lawfully present.” This type of rhetoric tends to conflate individual actions with the entire Somali community, raising alarms about the potential for widespread discrimination.
Rep. Ilhan Omar, a prominent voice in the Somali community and a frequent target in Trump’s narrative, challenged this perspective. “If a person commits a crime, they face justice. You don’t put that crime on a whole community,” she emphasized. She pointed out that none of the individuals implicated in the fraud cases currently hold TPS, underscoring the misapplication of collective blame.
Research into the legal framework reveals that terminating TPS is not a straightforward task. Ana Pottratz Acosta, an immigration law professor, stated that the president’s unilateral authority is limited and involves a thorough review process regarding conditions in the home country. The DHS Secretary confirmed that while a review is underway, there is no conclusive decision yet. “TPS was always intended to be temporary,” she noted, but the long-standing protections imposed for Somalia deserve careful analysis.
The atmosphere remains charged. Faith groups and civil rights activists are speaking out against the rise in anti-Somali and anti-Muslim sentiments since Trump’s announcement. Khalid Omar, an activist, articulated a broader sentiment within the Somali community: “Somalis know what a dictator looks like, and Trump is a dictator.” Such statements reflect a deep sense of community solidarity amidst fear of increased persecution.
Voices like State Sen. Zaynab Mohamed raise pressing concerns about the rhetoric being leveraged against immigrants and the potential for violence it might incite. “This is about purging people like me from this country,” she warned. Similar warnings have been issued in light of past attacks, such as the 2017 firebombing of a mosque, which many link to the hostile narratives surrounding Muslim communities.
As of now, TPS protections for Somali immigrants remain in effect until at least March 2026, and any attempts to withdraw those protections without due process are expected to face legal challenges. “Multiple efforts to cancel TPS holders in the past were successfully litigated,” stated Attorney General Keith Ellison, highlighting the legal precedents that may influence the outcome of this situation.
For many Somali Americans, the stakes feel deeply personal. Organizer Malika Dahir remarked, “This would mean uprooting people who have been here over 30 years… dividing families, tearing them apart.” This perspective illustrates how the policy impacts real lives, with families potentially torn asunder due to sweeping political decisions.
Supporters of Trump’s initiative argue that the government must address pervasive fraud and question why a community that has received TPS for over three decades continues to need such protections. In contrast, advocates for the immigrant community underscore the ongoing dangers in Somalia—ranging from terrorist threats to food insecurity—which still justify TPS status.
The central policy question looms large: Should TPS designations evolve into indefinite protections for immigrant communities that have integrated into American society? Or do fraudulent acts by a minority invalidate the broader social contracts that apply to entire groups, regardless of their contributions?
As the debate unfolds, it shows no signs of settling. Trump loyalists call for immediate removal of TPS holders, while community advocates and legal experts assert that it’s the law, not inflammatory remarks, that should dictate the outcome. “You cannot end a status granted under law with a Facebook post or a tweet,” stated Omar Fateh, a Somali American state senator. His assertion is clear: regardless of the heated rhetoric, Somali Americans hold a rightful place in the fabric of the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
