In a striking display of political message-making, President Donald Trump introduces the “Presidential Walk of Fame” at the White House’s West Wing Colonnade. This new installation features framed portraits of past U.S. presidents, but one notable absence catches the eye: instead of a traditional image of former President Joe Biden, the exhibit showcases a photo of an autopen, a device used to replicate signatures. This choice is emblematic of Trump’s sustained criticism of Biden’s actions during his presidency, a claim he argues amounts to a reckless delegation of authority.
During the unveiling, Trump did not shy away from voicing his sentiments. “That’s Barack Hussein Obama,” he said in a video, gesturing towards the portraits. “This is Biden right here—he’s the worst President in the history of our country.” This scathing commentary reflects Trump’s view that Biden’s presidency has faltered in comparison to his predecessors, further underlined by the unusual presentation of an autopen instead of Biden’s portrait.
The timing of this presentation, around September 24, 2025, could indicate Trump’s desire to keep his narrative at the forefront of political discourse. The viral reception of Trump’s tweet showcasing the new exhibit suggests that many resonate with this message—an assertion grounded in his claims of Biden’s incompetence and cognitive decline. “It’s disgraceful,” Trump stated in July, lamenting what he sees as inappropriate uses of the autopen for signing important documents such as pardons and executive orders. His words carry weight among his supporters, who see this development as a powerful condemnation of Biden’s governance.
The autopen not only symbolizes a perceived failure in leadership but also connects to broader concerns raised by Trump regarding Biden’s presidential capabilities. A June 2025 memorandum from Trump’s White House Counsel underscores this point, asserting that Biden’s reliance on the device has effectively hidden significant aspects of his decision-making process. This sentiment reflects a persistent narrative among many Republicans that questions the authenticity of Biden’s leadership.
Despite Trump’s claims, evidence supporting the argument that Biden used the device as a means of concealing his cognitive health is thin. Congressional testimony from a former spokesperson for Biden, Ian Sams, highlights the limited interactions he had with Biden, which some interpret as raising doubts about the president’s condition. However, critics argue that such limited communication does not inherently justify questioning Biden’s abilities or decisions. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer expressed skepticism about Sams’s ability to judge Biden’s cognitive health based on his limited direct exposure.
Biden has firmly contested the assertions made against him, stating unequivocally, “I made the decisions during my presidency.” His rebuttal serves to reclaim agency over his actions, challenging the narrative popularized by Trump and his supporters. The divisive reception of the installation exemplifies the polarized political landscape. Supporters of Trump hail the exhibit as a bold assertion against Biden’s alleged incompetence, while opponents label it a petty and childish act.
Political strategist Jane Fleming Kleeb criticized the display, suggesting it distracts from real issues affecting the country. Similarly, former U.K. spokesman Alistair Campbell labeled the move as “sick” and “anti-American”—responses that highlight the disdain from those who view the exhibit as a misrepresentation of U.S. values and political decorum.
From a strategic standpoint, Trump’s installation serves multiple purposes: it raises doubts about Biden’s authority, reinforces calls for greater transparency regarding presidential fitness, and pivots the federal symbol to align with Trump’s portrayal of his own legacy. This conjunction of political narrative and tradition creates a combative atmosphere within a space typically reserved for bipartisan respect.
Trump’s alterations to the White House aesthetics, including changes made since his return, illustrate a continuous effort to reshape the narrative that surrounds his administration. The installation of the “Presidential Walk of Fame” emphasizes this pattern—transforming the Colonnade into a center for political storytelling, reflecting Trump’s personalized approach to his legacy.
While the ongoing investigation into the use of the autopen remains inconclusive, the message embedded within this display is unmistakable. Through the lens of Trump’s narrative, Biden’s presidency is framed not just as ineffective but as fundamentally illegitimate. The imagery of a mechanical device in place of a human portrait embodies this sentiment, conveying a belief that Biden’s leadership is merely a facade, lacking true presidential authority.
The future of the installation remains uncertain; whether it endures or is dismantled by a succeeding administration may well depend on the evolving political landscape. For now, the “Presidential Walk of Fame” resonates loudly, making potent statements without uttering a single word, marking a new chapter in the ongoing saga of U.S. political theater.
"*" indicates required fields
