Trump Calls for Unified AI Law Amid Rising Fears of “Woke AI”
Former President Donald Trump is raising alarm over the current state of artificial intelligence regulation in America. He argues that Congress must enact a federal law to establish a unified standard for AI. A fragmented approach, with states setting their own rules, may threaten the nation’s AI leadership. This push follows Trump’s executive orders aimed at removing what he labels “DEI ideology” from federally used AI models.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump emphasized that “overregulation by the States is threatening to undermine this Growth Engine.” He particularly targeted blue states for incorporating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) principles into AI systems. He warns of a new phenomenon he terms “Woke AI,” citing instances where historical narratives are altered or diminished in favor of political correctness.
Trump’s directive points to concerns among conservatives who fear that ideologically driven AI could distort facts and limit free speech. As discussions heat up in Congress about integrating federal AI regulation into the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act, the pressure is mounting.
Trump’s AI Orders: No Room for Activist Code
On July 23, 2025, Trump rolled out an executive order mandating that all federal agencies only buy AI systems that adhere to strict criteria of truthfulness and ideological neutrality. Known as the “Unbiased AI Principles,” these guidelines explicitly ban the inclusion of DEI ideology and critical race theory.
The reasoning behind this move is clear; several administration sources have reported that certain AI tools have distorted historical facts while selectively refusing prompts for ideological reasons. For example, there are allegations of AI altering the race of prominent historical figures. In other instances, AI tools have reportedly refused to celebrate the achievements of white individuals while favoring narratives of other racial groups. There are also reports of extreme compliance, such as advising against “misgendering” in life-or-death survival situations, raising eyebrows about priorities in crisis management.
The executive order outlines that “one of the most pervasive and destructive of these ideologies is so-called ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI).” It asserts that DEI undermines the commitment to truth, leaning toward preferred outcomes instead. Implementing these principles requires federal procurement officers to update contracts swiftly, with non-compliant vendors facing serious repercussions.
Turning Federal Firepower Toward State Overreach
Trump’s advocacy for federal preemption is largely a reaction to increased state involvement in AI governance. Several left-leaning states like California and New York have initiated or enforced strict regulations that tackle alleged AI issues such as bias and civil rights violations. Critics contend, however, that these measures may stifle technological progress vital for global competition.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise has voiced concerns about “regulatory chaos” arising from conflicting state laws. Vice President JD Vance warned that “excessive regulation…could kill a transformative industry.” Trump himself noted that patchwork regulations could turn AI from an asset into a liability. He stated, “Investment in AI is helping to make the U.S. Economy the ‘HOTTEST’ in the World,” underscoring that political agendas at the state level might threaten this economic growth.
The stakes are high when it comes to the AI industry, with estimates from the McKinsey Global Institute suggesting that AI could contribute an astonishing $13 trillion to global GDP by 2030. The U.S. could be a formidable leader in this arena, but businesses fear that navigating a maze of varying rules could decelerate investment and push smaller firms out of the market.
Opposition Inside the GOP
While Trump garners support from several federal lawmakers advocating for a unified regulatory framework, he faces dissent from within his party. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has warned that such federal preemption could inadvertently empower Big Tech, stripping states of the means to safeguard their citizens from various online abuses and censorship concerns.
“Blanket preemption is a subsidy to Big Tech,” DeSantis argued. He cautions that it could undermine states’ ability to protect against issues like online censorship and intellectual property violations. This debate illuminates a broader ideological struggle within conservatism: the challenge of reconciling economic liberties with cultural and digital independence.
Even some Democrats are raising caution. Senator Elizabeth Warren has expressed concerns about potential government entanglements with major AI firms. “OpenAI may be pursuing a deliberate strategy to entangle itself with the federal government,” she remarked, highlighting fears that taxpayer money could support tech companies that mismanage their operations.
Industry Navigates Turbulent Waters
AI companies find themselves caught in a bind. On one hand, they are pressured by federal mandates not to incorporate liberal ideologies into their programming. On the other hand, they are faced with demands from blue states that prioritize inclusivity and equity in AI systems. To qualify for federal contracts as outlined in Trump’s executive order, companies must reveal any content filters or ideological biases within their models.
This balancing act creates tension among AI developers. They must navigate the risks of suppressing offensive outputs against the need to maintain neutrality, lest they invite backlash from conservative circles. A notable incident involved Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot, which faced severe criticism after adjusting its safety filters, leading to a troubling output that sparked outrage.
What Comes Next?
As debates over AI regulation intensify in Congress, Trump’s call for a single national standard is gaining traction. Collaborations among industry leaders, senators, and policy advisors are expected to be vigorous in the weeks ahead, particularly regarding the possibility of incorporating preemptive AI regulations into the well-trodden National Defense Authorization Act.
In the interim, the federal implementation of the Unbiased AI Principles is well underway. Federal agencies are currently re-evaluating their AI tools, amending procurement contracts, and coordinating closely with the Office of Management and Budget. The first full compliance benchmarks are anticipated by early 2026.
For Trump and his supporters, the mission is distinctly clear: establish a national framework that fuels AI innovation while avoiding ideological distortion. They no longer want AI to simply reflect social agendas. Instead, they envision AI as a technology that promotes truth and knowledge without leaning into indoctrination.
“We can do this in a way that protects children AND prevents censorship,” Trump declared, underscoring the conviction that AI should prioritize education over ideology.
"*" indicates required fields
