Tucker Carlson: Exploring the Connection Between Changing Roles and Women’s Mental Health
Tucker Carlson’s recent appearance on the “Modern Wisdom” podcast highlights a pressing issue: the increasing mental distress among women as traditional family roles decline. Carlson argues that a societal push away from these roles has led to emotional instability and rising dissatisfaction.
“I certainly know that they’re dissatisfied,” he expressed, a sentiment echoed by many. He accused a minority of restless individuals of undermining marriage—an institution he refers to as “the oldest institution in humanity.” This shift, he suggests, has not only affected those individuals but has had broader repercussions on society, contributing to widespread unhappiness.
The statistics back his claims. Data from the CDC reveals a troubling trend: 57% of high school girls reported persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness in 2021, up from 36% in 2011. This staggering rise underscores a notable shift in mental health over just a decade. For boys, the increase in similar feelings was far less pronounced, adding weight to the conversation surrounding how these societal changes have disproportionately affected women.
Moreover, nearly 30% of teen girls seriously considered suicide in 2021—an alarming statistic that further illustrates Carlson’s concerns. The stark differences in mental health diagnoses between men and women spotlight the ongoing crisis, with women twice as likely to be diagnosed with anxiety disorders, according to the National Institute of Mental Health.
He traces these issues back to the cultural upheaval of the 1960s and 1970s, pointing to second-wave feminism, which promoted a new vision of women’s liberation focused on career and sexual freedom rather than domestic roles. As the economy adapted to this new ideal, family structures and marriage rates began to suffer. The average age of first-time motherhood has moved from 21 in 1972 to nearly 30 today, while marriage rates have plummeted by over 60% since the ’70s.
For Carlson, these aren’t just numbers—they represent a loss of community and support systems. “Families are the only thing that will save you in the end,” he insists. “That’s all there is. And women are the center of families.” This perspective ties neatly into his assertion that the rise in personal dissatisfaction among women is linked to the disintegration of these essential family ties.
Data from the Pew Research Center reinforces Carlson’s view. In 2022, only 19% of women aged 18-29 considered achieving a high-paying career essential to a fulfilling life, while larger percentages valued marriage and children. This shift in priorities indicates a disillusionment with the ideals that once seemed liberating. In a 2023 Gallup survey, women reported lower mental health ratings compared to men, reflecting a disturbing trend reversal—historically, women had rated their emotional well-being higher.
Williamson pointed to the increased political activism among younger women, which Carlson categorized as “female extremism.” He argues that this behavior stems from a deep desire for purpose amid chaos. “People need deeper meaning,” he states, asserting that the absence of familial structures leads to unrest and a search for fulfillment in politics. Notably, the Women’s March in 2016, with its highest participation rates among unmarried, childless women aged 20-35, underscores how this demographic channels their discontent into political engagement.
Significant findings from a 2021 Harvard study suggested that young, liberal women experience more chronic anxiety and feelings of emptiness than their conservative counterparts—a worrying divide not as pronounced among men. Carlson’s exploration of these issues suggests a need for society to re-evaluate the balance between freedom and fulfilling roles, particularly in the context of family.
So, what does Carlson propose as a solution? He champions a return to foundational values centered around personal responsibility and family. “All the evidence suggests we were happier when we focused on our responsibilities to each other,” he states. Such arguments have resonated beyond traditional conservative circles. Psychiatrist Dr. Anna Lembke has noted that unchecked freedom without structure leads to a significant mental health crisis, emphasizing that meaningful lives often require sacrifice.
Carlson’s remarks prompt critical questions about public policy as well. If the decline of traditional family structures correlates with deteriorating mental health, should policy incentives be realigned? Should society prioritize family formation over individual achievement? Current systems often inadvertently penalize marriage through tax codes and educational messaging that prioritize careers, potentially contributing to the issues Carlson highlights.
In conclusion, Carlson’s engagement in these discussions reflects growing concerns about the emotional toll of modern life. Despite gaining freedoms, women are paradoxically reporting higher levels of distress. The task ahead involves examining the institutions designed to empower and determining whether they have instead left many women feeling adrift.
"*" indicates required fields
