Rep. Eugene Vindman, a retired Army colonel and former member of Trump’s National Security Council, has called on President Donald Trump to disclose a contentious 2019 phone call with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Vindman argues that “the American people deserve to know what was said,” especially following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. His demand comes amid a critical backdrop of transparency and trust with the U.S. intelligence community. Vindman has drawn a troubling parallel between this incident and Trump’s controversial conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which led to Trump’s first impeachment.
In a display of solidarity, Vindman stood alongside Khashoggi’s widow, Hanan Alter Khashoggi, while expressing his belief that the truth should come to light. “The Khashoggi family and the American people deserve to know what was said on that call,” he stated. He continued, asserting that the president had opted to “sidelined his own intelligence community to shield a foreign leader.” This, he contends, put America’s credibility on the line.
This plea for transparency underscores a long-standing tension in U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding its relationship with Saudi Arabia. The current administration has ramped up military and economic partnerships with the kingdom, raising ethical questions surrounding accountability and human rights. While Washington’s embrace of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman aims to strengthen strategic interests, critics note a recurring theme: foreign relationships sometimes come at the expense of moral clarity.
The ongoing links between Saudi Arabia and the U.S. come into sharper focus through recent agreements. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared, “The U.S.-Saudi friendship is now a partnership for the future.” With defense deals and nearly $1 trillion in new investments pledged by Saudi Arabia across a variety of U.S. industries, the administration frames these actions as beneficial to American job growth and economic stability. Yet, the shadow of Khashoggi’s murder and suspicions surrounding Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks complicate these assertions.
During an appearance alongside Trump, Crown Prince bin Salman faced tough questions from media about his alleged role in Khashoggi’s death. Trump’s defenders often portray Vindman’s criticisms as politically motivated, even suggesting that they derive from a desire to undermine Trump’s presidency in the name of transparency. For them, Vindman’s call reflects yet another chapter in an already charged narrative within Trump-era politics.
Bin Salman, when confronted directly about U.S. intelligence assessments stating his approval of Khashoggi’s murder, offered regret, calling it “a huge mistake.” However, he also maintained his consistent denial of involvement. Thus, the interplay of accountability and alliance remains unresolved. Families of 9/11 victims find themselves grappling with the complexities of these diplomatic ties as they seek justice for their loved ones lost in the 2001 terrorist attacks.
The topic of 9/11 adds yet another layer to these discussions. A 2021 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence indicated that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince likely sanctioned Khashoggi’s assassination. Nevertheless, the official narrative maintains that there is no conclusive evidence linking the Saudi state to the 9/11 attacks. Concerns voiced by families of victims regarding bin Salman’s presence in the White House reflect broader sentiments about trust and transparency in these high-stakes relationships. While bin Salman has publicly acknowledged the impact of Khashoggi’s murder, he has often shifted the narrative to suggest that the real tragedy lies in the strained U.S.-Saudi relationship stemming from the 9/11 attacks.
As the U.S. presses its partnership with Saudi Arabia, the voices of Khashoggi’s family and the 9/11 victims’ families demand attention. With a federal judge ruling in 2025 to bring Saudi Arabia to trial for its complicity in the attacks, the weight of public opinion surrounding these issues looms large. The saga emphasizes the delicate balance the U.S. must strike between securing strategic alliances and maintaining moral integrity and accountability on the world stage.
In this ongoing story, the pressure is mounting for greater transparency—whether regarding Khashoggi’s murder or the narrative of 9/11—highlighting a critical junction of ethics and pragmatism in U.S. foreign policy. The demand for clarity in government dealings is not just a question of politics; it is a matter of trust between leaders and the citizens they serve.
"*" indicates required fields
