In a recent incident that highlights a troubling trend in higher education, Heather Stafford, the Director of Student Health Services at Wichita State University, has reportedly been caught on audio admitting that the university is concealing its LGBTQ medical services from public view. Recorded comments made by Stafford suggest a deliberate obfuscation of these services, sparking backlash and concern over the use of taxpayer money in supporting such initiatives.
Stafford’s statement, made public by the conservative outlet Libs of TikTok, explicitly admits, “We still do them,” referring to treatments that include gender-affirming hormones and preventive measures for sexually transmitted infections. These programs, designed for students aged 19 and older, include PrEP and PEP for HIV prevention. In the leaked audio, she acknowledged that the university removed these services from its website “for obvious reasons,” raising questions about transparency and accountability in taxpayer-funded institutions.
This situation reflects a broader concern among critics of higher education. Many argue that the “Woke agenda” is at play, with institutions unexpectedly shielding such programs from scrutiny. The concealment is particularly egregious given the backdrop of a Trump administration initiative that insists schools must align with merit-based opportunities and curb diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Under the Executive Order to end illegal discrimination, universities risk losing federal funding if they maintain discriminatory practices disguised as inclusivity.
The Kansas Board of Regents has also issued directives requiring state universities to dismantle DEI-related activities following the signing of Senate Bill 125 by the governor. Despite this clear instruction, Stafford’s acknowledgment that Wichita State continues to offer LGBTQ medical services, while simultaneously hiding them, underscores a disconnect between policy mandates and institutional actions.
While the university and involved parties have so far refrained from commenting on this growing uproar, the implications of Stafford’s admission cannot be overlooked. Critics assert that this hidden aspect of university operations not only disregards legal requirements but also fosters an environment where taxpayer dollars fund initiatives that many feel promote division rather than unity.
This incident serves as a call for transparency in higher education, challenging institutions to adhere to state and federal guidelines while maintaining accountability for how they operate and allocate funds. As higher education continues to grapple with issues of inclusion and equity, incidents like these highlight a critical point of concern for taxpayers and stakeholders invested in the integrity of public institutions.
"*" indicates required fields
