A comprehensive report from an antisemitism research institute is drawing attention in the final hours leading up to the mayoral election in New York City. The report scrutinizes the ideological background of socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani, revealing concerning associations and statements that raise alarm bells. Charles Asher Small, the founding director of The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, emphasized the importance for voters to grasp Mamdani’s underlying belief system. “It is incumbent on voters to understand the ideological context that Zohran Mamdani comes from and espouses,” Small stated. This warning sets the stage for a deeper examination of Mamdani’s background and the implications of his rise in the political arena.
The report, titled “Zohran Mamdani: From SJP to Gracie Mansion?,” delves into Mamdani’s roots, including the controversial views held by his father, a Columbia University professor. It highlights Mamdani’s role in founding the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter during his time at Bowdoin College. His association with anti-Israel figures and organizations is notable, raising questions about his stance on crucial issues. The report takes a particularly critical look at his reluctance to condemn incendiary slogans linked to violence against Jews, stating, “He has repeatedly declined to condemn the slogan ‘globalize the intifada,’ ignoring the fact that the word ‘intifada’ is synonymous with terror attacks, suicide bombings, and incitement to kill Jews.” Instead of a firm denouncement, Mamdani has opted to merely say he would “discourage” such language.
Mamdani’s past remarks regarding the situation in Israel and his actions, including introducing a bill aimed at penalizing New York charities that support Israel, have further fueled criticism. His characterization of Israel’s military response to attacks as “genocide” following the deadly assault on October 7 shows a troubling disconnect from the realities on the ground. Such statements cast doubt on his readiness to lead in a diverse and historically complex city like New York.
Moreover, Mamdani generated significant backlash last month when he shared a photo with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, a controversial figure known for his past associations with terrorism. This connection has raised eyebrows among law enforcement and community leaders alike. The ISGAP report did not shy away from addressing these connections, pointing out that fundraising ties with groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization that has faced scrutiny due to its designation as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial, only deepen concerns about Mamdani’s alliances.
Charles Asher Small provided further context on the potential dangers of Mamdani’s rhetoric and associations, stating, “The normalization of antisemitism and anti-democratic rhetoric is now mainstream.” He warns that political extremes are rallying against the democratic center, using antisemitism as a tool for scapegoating. “Words and ideas lead to action,” Small cautioned, suggesting that the discourses surrounding Mamdani could incite increased violence and hate against Jewish communities.
A chorus of opposition against Mamdani has emerged from within the Jewish community, with hundreds of rabbis uniting in a letter urging voters to reject his candidacy. They insist that Jewish Americans “cannot remain silent” in the face of discrimination. Yet, despite this backlash, Mamdani appears to hold a substantial lead in polls. His ability to connect with disenchanted voters, particularly the youth, speaks to a broader sense of frustration with the status quo. “There are significant levels of economic, social and political marginalization in New York and throughout the nation,” Small remarked, observing how these feelings make populist and extremist ideas increasingly appealing.
The report’s conclusion warns of profound implications should Mamdani win the election. It suggests that his victory could “shatter the city’s fragile communal trust and roll back decades of hard-won progress in protecting Jewish life.” This sentiment encapsulates the duality of Mamdani’s political rise; it is a blend of discontent over economic issues and an advancing radicalism that masquerades as progressive politics. The findings of the ISGAP report highlight a troubling shift in the political landscape, as radical anti-Zionism becomes intertwined with mainstream political discourse, presenting a real threat to the security of New York’s Jewish population.
The upcoming election is more than just a local political race. It represents a critical juncture in the battle over values and identity in New York City, and the results may have lasting consequences on its diverse communities.
"*" indicates required fields
