A recently released video reveals New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani leading protests just days after a horrific attack by Hamas, where over 1,200 Israelis lost their lives. The footage shows him on the streets, chanting in front of a crowd and accusing Israel of committing “genocide.” This moment highlights Mamdani’s troubling perspective.
On October 7, the world witnessed an unprecedented scale of violence against Jews, with families slaughtered in their homes. Amid this chaos, Mamdani chose to publicly denounce Israel, even before the country had mobilized a significant military response. This reaction raises serious questions about his motives. How can one label Israel a perpetrator of “genocide” when it is still in the process of mourning its dead?
Mamdani’s claims fall into a broader trend of labeling Israel as an “apartheid state,” a statement that fails to withstand even cursory examination. In this context, it is worth noting that Israel is home to a diverse population, including Arab citizens who participate fully in civic life. They have voting rights, serve in the Knesset—the country’s parliament—and can be found in high-ranking judicial positions, such as the late Justice Salim Joubran, who spent years on Israel’s Supreme Court.
In stark contrast, conditions in Gaza are dire for anyone not aligned with Hamas. The reality is that a Jew crossing into Gaza faces execution. This sharp disparity is often overlooked in discussions surrounding Mamdani’s views. While he plays the part of a human rights advocate, his narrative curiously excludes critical situations like the persecution of Christians in Nigeria or the violence in Sudan. His focus remains solely on actions taken by allies of the United States, raising the question: what truly drives his outrage?
Mamdani’s pattern of behavior reflects a deep-seated animosity toward the West. His critiques seem less about human rights and more about undermining the very principles that fuel free societies. His rhetoric against capitalism and so-called “rich elites” aligns with a broader agenda—not of seeking justice, but of dismantling the concepts of democracy and moral integrity, which distinguish free nations from those that celebrate terror and oppression.
The people of New York have a right to expect better from their leaders—individuals who uplift victims instead of siding with extremists. Mamdani’s approach does not represent a pathway to peace or justice; it raises concerns about his suitability for public office. As New Yorkers approach their next elections, they should weigh the implications of electing a candidate with such troubling views on freedom and human rights.
"*" indicates required fields
