A recently published report by several conservative energy and climate groups has underscored a significant shift in climate change activism in 2025. The report arrives as President Donald Trump resumes the presidency, bringing with him a strong agenda aimed at revitalizing American energy production. Those involved in drafting the document assert that this year marks a decisive move away from a focus on climate change to prioritizing energy security and economic growth.
The groups behind the report, including the American Energy Institute and The Energy & Environment Legal Institute, describe 2025 as “the year of the cultural departure from climate activism.” They characterize the current landscape as a “tipping point for climate realism.” Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, framed this moment as unexpected for climate advocates, stating, “The world is waking up to the reality that net-zero was never achievable.” This viewpoint reflects broader skepticism toward net-zero goals and a call for practical energy policies.
Trump’s administration has taken immediate steps to roll back regulations that were integral to previous climate initiatives. On his return to the White House, he signed an executive order aimed at “unleashing American energy,” indicating a clear pivot toward fossil fuels. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he enacted on July 4, consolidates this direction by dismantling clean energy incentives put in place under the Biden administration. “2025’s tipping points are the product of President Trump’s energy dominance agenda,” stated Steve Milloy, an influential figure in the conservative energy movement.
The report goes beyond policy changes to illustrate the shifting narrative within the media regarding climate change. The authors point to key instances where major outlets have acknowledged diverging viewpoints, highlighting reports from The New York Times and others that reflect confusion and skepticism about the future of climate action. For example, articles discussing why “global momentum on climate action is faltering” signal a notable departure from the unwavering consensus seen previously.
Additionally, media coverage of the U.N. COP-30 climate conference noted the omission of fossil fuels in its final document—an aspect that the report’s authors interpret as a symbolic sign of changing priorities in response to economic pressures. They argue this illustrates a newfound realism in climate discourse, with attention increasingly shifting from climate activism to more tangible concerns like energy reliability and affordability.
The group’s analysis highlighted a response from various policymakers, including New York Governor Kathy Hochul, who remarked on the necessity to “govern in reality.” This sentiment echoes throughout the report, suggesting that even traditional proponents of climate initiatives are beginning to reconsider their positions in light of economic realities.
Moreover, the report touches on significant developments from corporate entities like ExxonMobil, which has publicly questioned the practicalities of net-zero commitments. These shifts reflect a broader skepticism that the report associates with a rise in “climate denial” rhetoric, underscoring the challenges facing longstanding climate policies.
As President Trump reasserts control over energy policy, this report paints a vivid picture of a landscape where climate activism is waning. Several high-profile organizations and influential voices are now championing a narrative that prioritizes energy independence and economic growth over expansive climate initiatives. The momentum of climate realism, as these conservative groups describe it, signals a new chapter in American energy policy, where practicality and economic concerns are set to dominate the discussion.
"*" indicates required fields
