In a striking display of progressive politics, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has publicly endorsed naming a snow plow “Abolish ICE” as part of the city’s annual contest. During an appearance on MSNBC’s Politics Nation with Rev. Al Sharpton, Johnson asserted that the name is not just a playful jab, but a serious critique of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. He referred to ICE as a “privatized force to enact terror,” underscoring his administration’s ideological stance against federal immigration enforcement.
Johnson’s strong words reveal a clear agenda. “And so over the course of several years in this city, we have stood firm on our values,” he declared, emphasizing not only an ideological commitment but also a political narrative that prioritizes these values over traditional views on law enforcement. This endorsement comes at a time when the naming contest is meant to be fun, but Johnson intertwines it with his administration’s ongoing battle against ICE, framing the agency as harmful to Chicago communities. His intention is evident: to rally support for a message that resonates with his base.
The snow plow naming competition, running until January 10, 2026, invites residents to submit imaginative names for the fleet that clears Chicago’s streets in winter. Previous entries like “Mrs. O’Leary’s Plow” and “Snower Wacker” embody the light-hearted spirit typically associated with this contest. However, Johnson’s backing of a name like “Abolish ICE” pushes the envelope, shifting the tone from playful to provocative.
Reactions to Johnson’s endorsement have been mixed. Supporters, particularly within left-leaning circles on social media, quickly embraced the idea, flooding platforms with affirmative messages. Response to the announcement on X showed a groundswell of enthusiasm: “Everyone else go home — this is the year we secure ABOLISH ICE on a Chicago Snowplow,” one user declared. This response illustrates support for Johnson’s stance among his constituents, suggesting a deeper alignment with leftist values in the city.
However, not all residents share this enthusiasm. Critics have railed against what they see as the politicization of a lighthearted event, dismissing Johnson’s endorsement as inappropriate for the context. One dissenting voice on X remarked, “The snow plow names are supposed to be fun and light-hearted. Not political. Don’t ruin a fun thing.” This highlights a clear divide—while some view the name as a bold statement, others see it as an unwelcome intrusion of political rhetoric into civic enjoyment.
Johnson’s administration has been characterized by aggressive rhetoric against ICE, positioning his government in opposition to federal authorities. This stance aligns with the mayor’s broader strategy to advocate for immigrant rights and against what he perceives as oppressive policing practices. In his view, naming a snow plow “Abolish ICE” is yet another step in solidifying his administration’s commitment to those principles.
This latest move serves to cement Johnson’s identity as a progressive leader who is willing to challenge the status quo. By endorsing a politically charged name for a city vehicle, Johnson risks alienating moderate voters, but he may gain traction with a base that seeks transformative change and stronger advocacy for immigrant communities. The long-term implications of this decision could lead to further friction between the city and federal authorities, particularly as tensions around immigration enforcement continue to dominate the national discourse.
Johnson’s enthusiastic support for “Abolish ICE” underscores a significant moment in Chicago’s political landscape, blending civic engagement with calls for systemic change. Whether the name ultimately graces a snow plow remains to be seen, but the discussions it ignites affirm the ongoing struggle over immigration policy and the varying perspectives that exist within the city.
"*" indicates required fields
