Analysis of Widespread CDL Licensing Fraud in Blue States
Recent reports reveal a troubling trend of fraud involving commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) in states such as California and Minnesota. Secretary Sean Duffy has sounded the alarm about these so-called “CDL mills” that issue licenses to foreign applicants who lack the necessary language skills and safety knowledge to operate large trucks on American roads. Such practices raise serious concerns about highway safety and regulatory oversight.
At the heart of the matter is compliance with federal laws governing CDL issuance. Duffy highlighted the risks when he noted that “fake CDL schools are running rampant,” allowing individuals who can’t comprehend basic traffic signs to operate vehicles weighing upwards of 80,000 pounds. This is not just a logistical issue but a profound safety hazard. Investigations have shown that many of these fraudulent schools coach students to memorize answers to written tests and falsify road skills evaluations. In some instances, interpreters were improperly used during exams, which directly contravenes federal regulations requiring applicants to demonstrate English proficiency independently.
The significance of these findings cannot be overstated. In California, authorities have scrutinized numerous driving schools since 2022, uncovering instances where a single instructor processes hundreds of test applications each month—figures that raise red flags regarding the legitimacy of the program’s operations. Similarly, an examiner in Illinois was convicted of bribery after passing applicants who had never even driven a truck. Such blatant abuses suggest a failure in oversight that allows these schools to compromise public safety without consequence.
Moreover, the toll of these fraudulent systems extends beyond safety. The U.S. trucking industry is experiencing a severe driver shortage, with around 80,000 positions unfilled as of 2023. This desperate situation has prompted some employers to cut corners, seeking fast solutions rather than ensuring proper training and compliance with federal guidelines. As a former Minnesota state trooper rightly pointed out, “It’s a ticking time bomb.”
The federal mandate for English proficiency is critical for both safety and effective communication with law enforcement. Despite this, reports indicate that the use of interpreters is widespread in states with minimal oversight, as seen in a recent case in California. A student was awarded passing scores without knowing any English, raising questions about the integrity of the testing process. Duffy articulated the broader concern: “The problem isn’t that we’re training immigrants. The problem is that licensed drivers are hitting the road without understanding the signs, the safety codes, or even the instructions from emergency responders.”
Regulatory responses to these issues are underway, with several schools now facing closure or suspension of their license issuance authority. Notable actions include the revocation of a Fresno-based program’s testing authority after audits revealed improbably high pass rates. Across both California and Minnesota, state DMVs are currently reviewing thousands of licenses issued under questionable circumstances, with the potential for significant revocation of licenses connected to improperly trained applicants.
The consequences of such fraudulent licensing extend into economic territory as well. Many of these illegitimate programs depend on taxpayer-funded job training initiatives or private loans. As a result, failing training programs lead to unqualified drivers who find themselves unemployed shortly after securing a license, leaving taxpayers to shoulder the financial burden of defaults on loans tied to these flawed programs.
In Minnesota, alarming audit findings revealed that nearly 60% of students from a now-closed driving school either failed their first road tests or were let go by their employers within three months. Over six years, this institution processed close to $3 million in public workforce grants while lacking a proper fleet or trainers, showcasing a critical breakdown in accountability.
As Duffy and his supporters call for comprehensive reforms, the fragmented nature of CDL testing oversight complicates the path forward. States can authorize third-party testers, which has led to variations in standards not always aligned with safety. Duffy criticized this decentralized testing approach, stating, “When you privatize license testing without strict national enforcement, you invite this kind of fraud.” There is an urgent need for further transparency and rigorous audits of CDL issuance trends to combat this crisis.
While the immediate response has involved shutting down fraudulent schools and filing criminal charges against their operators, the underlying system that enabled these practices remains under scrutiny. The potential for danger remains as long as fraudulent licenses circulate among unqualified drivers. A former CDL examiner’s words capture the essence of the issue: “This is not about immigration. It’s about accountability—and putting safe, qualified drivers behind the wheel.” Until the system is restructured to ensure genuine accountability and safety measures, the threat to public safety will continue unabated.
"*" indicates required fields
