Analysis of Trump’s “Football” Naming Proposal
On July 13, 2025, President Donald Trump stirred the pot during the FIFA Club World Cup final, renewing the conversation about the name of the world’s most popular sport in America. He questioned why Americans use the term “soccer” when, to him, it is “football” without dispute. “We have to come up with another name for the NFL,” he stated, flipping the longstanding argument on its head with humor and candidness.
Trump’s remarks, made during a televised interview at MetLife Stadium, unfolded just after Chelsea FC claimed victory over Paris Saint-Germain. The president attended the ceremony, congratulating the champions and helping to distribute medals. Chelsea captain Reece James described the atmosphere as “quite loud,” while teammate Cole Palmer expressed surprise at Trump’s presence on stage, revealing the unpredictability of his appearance. This moment underscored not only the growing popularity of soccer in the United States but also the complex relationship the country maintains with its global counterparts in sports.
Soccer has made notable strides in America, with attendance numbers rising and significant media attention following the arrival of stars like Lionel Messi to Major League Soccer. The U.S. Soccer Federation has reported increases in youth enrollment, signaling that the sport is gaining audiences young and old. Still, the naming convention stirs feelings of cultural pride. In much of the world, it’s known as “football,” but Americans have held onto “soccer” to distinguish it from their homegrown version of the sport.
By suggesting a possible rebranding of the NFL, Trump’s comments opened the debate wide, highlighting the perceived absurdity of the current terminology. He noted, “It’s called ‘football,’ but I guess we call it ‘soccer,’ but that change could be made very easily.” The language surrounding sports can shape how cultural identities and traditions are viewed. As Dr. Stefan Szymanski pointed out, the origin of the word “soccer” is traced to Britain but has become contentious when used by Americans.
The discord surrounding these terms touches on deeper sentiments of national pride and global belonging. In the context of the growing connections within the football community and the United States’ increasing stake in the game, the naming debate could shift from a trivial concern to a crucial matter of identity. Trump’s remarks remind us that names and terms reflect broader cultural narratives, intertwining sport with national identity.
The economic implications of this debate cannot be overlooked. The NFL generates substantial revenue, and any changes could be met with strong resistance from a passionate fan base deeply entrenched in American football traditions. However, from a legislative point of view, a president has the power to influence terminology through executive orders, setting established languages for federal reports and communications. While it may not bind private sectors like the NFL, it signals intent and could elevate discussions about sports’ importance in American culture.
What Trump’s comments also highlight is the idea that language can represent unity or division in global contexts. “The game is about unity, it is about everyone getting together,” Trump asserted. In light of the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup, where the U.S. will play a central role, the outcome of this linguistic contention may serve as a microcosm of America’s relationship with global football. Outside perspectives on American terminology in sports can evoke discomfort but also challenge the U.S. to reflect on its cultural standing in the world.
Ultimately, whether Americans adopt “football” or continue using “soccer” speaks to larger questions of identity, heritage, and the ongoing struggle between tradition and globalization. Trump’s light-hearted suggestion has reignited a debate about names and meanings, proving once again that even in sports, nothing is ever quite settled.
"*" indicates required fields
