Assessing Bluesky’s Decline Amidst User Migration Back to X
Recent analysis of Bluesky’s performance shows the platform is struggling to maintain its initial momentum as users increasingly return to X. Despite its ambitious promise of decentralization and user empowerment, Bluesky’s ability to engage and retain users has not lived up to expectations.
Elon Musk’s pointed observation encapsulates the growing discontent among users: “Turns out that hall monitors constantly ratting on each other isn’t compelling.” This comment resonates with those who were hopeful about Bluesky but found the reality lacking. The allure of a fresh platform has faded as users reassess their engagement.
The rise of Bluesky began in February 2024, coinciding with a wave of dissatisfaction with X. Political tensions and a temporary ban on X in Brazil fueled this growth, as users sought alternatives. Initial numbers were impressive, with Bluesky attracting over 30 million users by early 2025. However, studies indicate this surge came during a particularly charged political climate, and once the pressure eased, so did user interest.
Research from Indiana University paints a stark picture: while Bluesky had bursts of activity, especially during political events, daily engagement has plummeted. By early 2025, only 15% of its users were active daily. The majority of users merely observed, contributing little to the content that drives engagement.
As soon as conditions improved on X, users began to return. Once the ban in Brazil lifted, the number of Portuguese-speaking users on Bluesky sharply declined. This underscores the fleeting nature of Bluesky’s appeal, demonstrating that its draw was circumstantial rather than a sustainable shift in user behavior.
Bluesky’s design, meant to encourage decentralized discussions, struggled to create the viral engagement needed to thrive. A separate study revealed that while it attracted niche scholarly discussions, that content rarely achieved the visibility or shareability found on X. The numbers speak volumes—only about half of scholarly posts received even minimal engagement, significantly lower compared to X’s broader reach and established engagement patterns.
Moreover, platform saturation compounds Bluesky’s challenges. A structural analysis reveals that while clusters of users are forming, much of the network remains disconnected. This fragmentation limits interaction and fails to create a vibrant community, stalling Bluesky’s growth in favor of a few dominant voices.
Culturally, Bluesky is perceived as leaning left, fostering an environment where ideological enforcement often overshadows open dialogue. Users have expressed hesitance, fearing repercussions for diverging from a perceived norm. Musk’s critique that the culture is “uncompelling” is echoed by many who value freedom of expression over restrictive content moderation.
In academic discussions—where Bluesky has seen some traction—the early gains appear to stem from political migrations rather than enduring interest. Although it surpassed X briefly in certain metrics related to scholarly content, those advantages are likely to evaporate without sustained user engagement.
Er-Te Zheng, a co-author of one of the studies, noted, “The stabilization of posts, users, and referenced articles suggests that Bluesky has already established itself as a credible and lasting platform for science communication. But whether it can compete with X at scale is a different question.” Zheng’s cautionary sentiment indicates that while Bluesky may find a niche, its aspirations for broad relevance remain in jeopardy.
Despite efforts by Bluesky’s moderation team to tackle spam and suspicious behavior, these initiatives have not been enough to invigorate user participation. The balance between user control and sustaining a lively platform has proven elusive, with Bluesky unable to replicate the robust network effects enjoyed by larger platforms.
The overarching narrative is clear: Bluesky rose on the wave of discontent with X but ultimately failed to provide compelling reasons for users to remain. X, under Musk’s leadership, continues to roll out changes that spark conversation, both positive and negative, keeping users engaged even amid controversy. This chaos appears to resonate more deeply with those familiar with the social media landscape.
User experiences and sentiments have come full circle, with jokes about Bluesky’s cultural shortcomings gaining traction on X. One user’s remark—“Turns out freedom is more fun than a ‘safe space’”—captures the essence of why some prefer the dynamics found on X.
Ultimately, X’s robust user base and high engagement levels highlight a fundamental truth in the social media realm: building a platform encompasses more than just innovative policies and design—it requires constant user engagement and excitement. As Bluesky flounders, X remains a dominant force in the landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
