Joe Biden made a notable appearance on Friday at a forum organized by the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute. He was there to accept the Chris Abele Impact Award, which recognizes his administration’s efforts to create the most LGBTQ+ inclusive government in U.S. history. The award was presented to him for his appointments, including a black lesbian press secretary and a gay Transportation Secretary, among others.
The LGBTQ+ Victory Institute highlighted Biden’s achievements, underscoring the significance of appointing diverse leaders to top government roles. Evan Low, the organization’s president, praised Biden’s commitment to empowering LGBTQ+ individuals and fostering inclusivity at the government level. “His administration set a new and necessary standard for what inclusive governance looks like,” Low stated, emphasizing improvements in civil rights protections and the appointment of a record number of LGBTQ+ officials.
However, questions remain about the qualifications of these officials, as the focus on identity politics raises concerns about meritocracy. Critics argue that qualifications should take precedence over personal identities in leadership decisions. This sentiment was echoed in Biden’s speech, where he shouted for attendees to “fight back” against the Trump administration, showcasing a combative tone that many found uninspiring.
During his remarks, Biden’s delivery was anything but polished. He told attendees to “get up and fight back” while insisting the fight was about protecting the Constitution. Yet, his speech lacked coherence and clarity. At one point, he stumbled over the name of the country, calling it “the United States of Ameragotit.” Such verbal slips have become a trend in his public speaking engagements, raising further concerns about his ability to communicate effectively.
In summary, while Biden’s efforts to promote diversity within his administration may be recognized by some, the effectiveness of his leadership and the qualifications of his appointees remain contentious issues. His recent appearance proved to be another moment that captured the attention of critics, as the tone and content of his speech left much to be desired.
"*" indicates required fields
