As the search for the suspect in the tragic shooting at Brown University continues, scrutiny is intensifying around the university’s president, Christina Paxson. In a press conference held on Tuesday, the lack of concrete information about the investigation left many concerned. Paxson expressed sadness over the questioning of the university’s commitment to safety but failed to provide critical details that could calm the anxious community.
“The primary point that I wanted to address before we get to questions is that Brown is deeply committed to the safety, security, and well-being of our community,” Paxson stated. Yet, her comments did little to quell sentiments on social media, where users voiced their frustration. Matt Whitlock, a Republican communicator, remarked on X, “You may be tempted to blame a violent terrorist or even a failed security apparatus when an innocent person is murdered… but don’t forget… it’s actually the gun’s fault.” Such remarks reflect a pervasive frustration with those at the helm during crises.
Critics are not holding back. Samantha Janney, a Twitchy.com editor, labeled Paxson as “awful,” highlighting concerns from families considering the safety of their children in light of recent events. Canadian politician Lisa MacLeod echoed similar sentiments, questioning Paxson’s focus amid the ongoing manhunt for a shooter who remains at large.
Paxson’s exchanges with reporters during these tense days raised eyebrows as well. When asked if she knew what the students were doing when the shooting took place, she simply replied, “I do not know.” Her response to whether Brown had appropriate security measures in place was no more reassuring. “I do,” she said, prompting further concern about the university’s preparedness for such violent incidents.
The university’s decision-making has drawn attention not only for its current crisis but also for its financial leadership. Paxson’s jump in compensation—a staggering 74% increase to over $3 million in 2023—has not gone unnoticed. In a mere eleven years since her appointment, her pay has ballooned by more than 700%, a figure reported by the Brown Daily Herald that seems jarring amid the backdrop of financial complaints from the university community.
Paxson holds significant roles beyond the university, including chairing the board of directors at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. However, her track record is mixed. While she stood her ground against calls for university divestment from certain political movements in 2019, she has also drawn ire for decisions that some critics describe as out of touch with student needs. Alex Shieh, a student who testified before Congress, highlighted the university’s administrative bloat, which he argues contributes to soaring costs.
The recent financial dealings, such as the $50 million agreement regarding workforce development, along with conditions imposed by the government, further complicate Brown’s standing. Paxson’s resistance to certain federal offers underscores her attempts to navigate the institutional complexities while facing criticism for not addressing fundamental issues like campus safety more directly.
Overall, Paxson is at a crucial juncture. The challenging nature of her leadership during this crisis and her past political engagements recycle questions of accountability amid rising critiques of the institution’s priorities. As the community grapples with the aftermath of tragedy, sustained scrutiny will likely define her presidency in the days ahead. The public and stakeholders are demanding clarity and action, not just declarations of commitment.
"*" indicates required fields
