The recent campus shooting at Brown University has ignited serious scrutiny regarding the institution’s security measures, particularly in light of the school’s considerable financial resources. On a Saturday afternoon, gunfire erupted in the Barus & Holley engineering building, claiming two lives and injuring eight others. The police are actively pursuing a suspect who fled the scene, described as a man dressed in black.
Among the concerns raised is the lack of effective surveillance systems. Brown University, which charges over $70,000 in tuition annually and boasts an endowment exceeding $8 billion, reportedly does not have a single security camera that captured a clear image of the shooter in the building. This glaring oversight has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters.
A tweet that has gained notable traction underscores this frustration: “Brown University tuition is $70,000. Its endowment is $8 billion and just hit a new record. AND THEY DON’T HAVE A SINGLE SECURITY CAMERA THAT GOT A CLEAR VIEW OF THE SHOOTER IN THE BUILDING!!! You can afford it! BUY SOME.” This sentiment resonates with many who question where the university’s hefty financial resources are allocated.
The absence of usable footage has not only hindered the investigation but has also left students and parents feeling vulnerable about safety on campus. During a press conference, Timothy O’Hara, Brown’s deputy chief of police, confirmed the shooter was last seen leaving the engineering building but noted no photos or videos of the suspect have been publicly released.
This shooting occurred during finals week in one of the university’s busiest buildings, which serves a vast number of students in the engineering and physics departments. Eyewitness accounts, like that of student Emma Ferraro, detail the confusion and fear as she heard “loud pops” and quickly sought safety. As police issued lockdown orders, the area was sealed off as law enforcement searched for the attacker.
Eight victims were rushed to Rhode Island Hospital with varying degrees of injuries. This tragedy raises important questions about the university’s preparedness for such incidents, especially given the serious implications of their police force’s limited accountability. Unlike public law enforcement, the Brown University Police Department operates under laws that exempt it from state public records regulations. This raises issues about transparency and oversight.
Following the shooting, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Rhode Island has reignited its lawsuit focused on the secrecy that shrouds the Brown police. Steven Brown, ACLU executive director, emphasized that these officers possess arrest powers equivalent to those of public police yet operate without the same scrutiny. This lack of transparency extends to a troubling past, including a bomb threat incident in 2021 that revealed a failure to connect with local police, reportedly to avoid drawing public attention.
The internal culture and operational practices of the university police force also catalyze criticism. Votes of no confidence were issued by two police unions representing officers and security staff, highlighting serious allegations such as toxic working conditions and retaliatory practices. A former officer, sharing his traumatic experience, voiced concerns about the department’s inclination to prioritize confidentiality over public safety. These revelations suggest systemic issues that hinder effective law enforcement and damage campus trust.
The university’s administration faces additional backlash for the confusion surrounding the shooter’s detainment status immediately after the incident, leading to further accountability questions. Providence Mayor Brett Smiley acknowledged the extensive resources devoted to locating the suspect, yet the initial misinformation compounded criticism over Brown’s emergency response protocols.
Brown’s situation reflects a broader issue among private institutions regarding police transparency, particularly when faced with grave incidents like a shooting. The federal Clery Act mandates the reporting of crime statistics but lacks stringent requirements for comprehensive transparency around campus safety and police accountability. Given Brown’s significant financial standing, many voices within the community are asking why stronger measures haven’t been taken to protect students effectively.
In response to the shooting, university spokespeople have remained tight-lipped about specifics, citing the ongoing investigation while reiterating safety as their primary concern. However, for students like Mari Camara, this reassurance offers little comfort. “Everyone is the same as me—shocked and terrified that something like this happened,” she commented, echoing the sentiments of concerned parents and students seeking clarity on how such a catastrophic event could transpire in daylight without effective surveillance.
The unanswered questions linger heavily: How could the university fail to protect its campus when armed with such vast financial resources? The community grapples with the horror of the event and the persistent fears for safety in the wake of inadequate security measures.
"*" indicates required fields
