Security Critique Post-Brown University Shooting: Key Issues Highlighted
The tragic shooting at Brown University, which left two students dead and nine others injured, has ignited a fierce debate over campus safety. On December 13, 2025, the incident unfolded inside the Barus and Holley building, raising pressing questions about the university’s security measures and the lack of surveillance equipment in crucial areas. The disappearance of the suspect, still unidentified after more than a week, adds urgency to these discussions.
Former President Donald Trump’s remarks encapsulate the mounting frustration: “Why did Brown University have so few security cameras? There can be no excuse for that. In the modern age, it just doesn’t get worse!” His criticism points to a glaring inadequacy in an institution that operates with a substantial endowment of $6.9 billion as of 2024.
The absence of effective surveillance has hampered investigative efforts. Video footage released shows a figure moving quickly near the building where the attack took place, yet authorities struggle to make a clear identification. “I don’t see anybody making a positive I.D.,” remarked Jody Weis, a retired FBI official. He deemed the situation “a mess,” particularly calling out an earlier press conference for failing to provide a physical description of the suspect.
Law enforcement has had to rely on street-level surveillance from nearby intersections instead of direct footage from within the university. This lack of comprehensive video monitoring in academic settings raises critical issues. The Ivy League’s failure to ensure full camera coverage, despite its urban location, is surprising and troubling. Although the area around the university is densely populated, gaps in on-campus surveillance have left significant vulnerabilities.
In the aftermath, witnesses like Spencer Yang ’29 described the chaos. “I tried to keep some people conscious,” he recounted, highlighting the immediate peril students faced during the attack. This personal account underscores the fear and confusion that enveloped the campus, now compounded by the ongoing manhunt for the shooter.
While law enforcement has deployed over 400 personnel to investigate, efforts to gather usable evidence have faced obstacles. Authorities have noted the recovery of firearms tied to a local hotel room, suggesting planning and intent on the shooter’s part. The FBI has claimed they are “turning over every stone,” yet the lack of actionable leads and descriptive information has drawn scrutiny on initial investigative steps.
Rhode Island officials have voiced both sadness and concern over the shooter’s continued freedom. Attorney General Peter Neronha underscored the danger posed by the armed suspect, while Providence Mayor Brett Smiley urged caution regarding misinformation: “If it did not come from an official channel, it is not official.” This insistence on verified information underscores the chaos that often follows such tragedies.
Beyond immediate law enforcement responses, the shooting has raised discussions about institutional accountability. Critics argue that minimum security measures should be the least expectation for a leading university. Talib Reddick ’26, president of the Undergraduate Council of Students, acknowledged the emotional toll on the community, stating, “We are frightened, we are angry, we are confused—but we are not broken.” This resilience speaks to a larger collective desire for change and action.
The statistics backing these security concerns further illustrate the pressing need. The American Council on Education reported that only 38% of colleges have comprehensive interior surveillance systems. For a top-tier institution like Brown, this statistic is deeply concerning. Experts suggest that this incident may prompt future considerations on campus safety technology standards. Bernard Rowe, a former campus security director, noted, “When you consider how quickly we can identify a shoplifter walking out of a department store, the gold standard for student safety should be far higher.”
As the investigation unfolds, there is increasing pressure on Brown University’s administration to address these shortcomings head-on. President Christina Paxson expressed sorrow and pledged cooperation with law enforcement while omitting a clear acknowledgment of the university’s surveillance issues. The institution must confront whether its safety protocols align with the expectations tied to its prestigious academic reputation.
The Brown shooting is now etched into the grim history of campus violence, a reminder of the urgent need for reform in safety protocols. Calls for enhanced surveillance measures go beyond mere public sentiment; they reflect a broader recognition that educational environments must adapt to modern safety requirements. The events of December 13 have left a mark that the university community will not easily forget, and the road ahead must focus on preventing such a tragedy from reoccurring.
"*" indicates required fields
