Interior Secretary Doug Burgum raises significant concerns about California’s reliance on foreign oil, labeling it a “national security risk.” His remarks highlight the consequences of strict energy regulations in blue states that, he claims, hinder U.S. energy independence. In a recent interview, Burgum compared California’s energy policies to those in places like Pennsylvania and Alaska, emphasizing the need for resource development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Burgum’s remarks echo those from President Trump, who has been vocal about tapping into America’s natural resources. “Natural gas in Pennsylvania is going to be [about] $1 in the summer; it might be $2 in the winter… but it’ll be $12 in New England because New England isn’t getting their gas from Pennsylvania,” Burgum stated. He drew attention to a chilling event from 2018 when New England had to import natural gas from Russia, an outcome linked to blocked pipeline projects from Pennsylvania. He suggests that California is walking down the same path by importing over 60% of its oil from foreign nations, with Iraq supplying a significant portion.
Burgum also pointed to the decline of California’s oil refineries—down from 40 to just nine—and the impending closure of more refineries, with some relocating to states like Texas. “There’s gonna be gasoline coming from foreign countries into California to run their cars,” he warned. The financial implications are stark, with gasoline prices in California nearly double what they are in states like Texas.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright amplified the message during a speech in Pennsylvania, blaming current energy policies for rising inflation and weakened national standing. He pointed out that energy production has deep roots in Pennsylvania’s history, citing the state’s pivotal role in U.S. energy from the first successful oil well to the Marcellus shale gas play. “High energy prices are a choice,” Wright said, referencing data showing average electricity costs significantly higher in blue states compared to red states.
According to findings from the Department of Energy, electricity costs are climbing faster in blue states, with California topping the list for the highest increases. The report indicated that average household electricity expenditures have risen disproportionately in these areas. California and Connecticut, for instance, faced annual household increases of $650 and $450 respectively, driven in part by their policies.
Meanwhile, some states like Hawaii also struggle with high energy costs due to a heavy reliance on oil imports. Yvonne Hunter from Hawaii’s state energy agency highlighted that 90% of energy consumption rests on imported fuels. In stark contrast, states like Pennsylvania, with well-established energy sectors, could provide a stable and economical supply.
The political landscape complicates these energy realities. In Virginia, Republicans faced setbacks related to rising costs during elections. Critics point fingers at the Biden administration’s energy policies for exacerbating the affordability crisis. Yet, Pennsylvania’s Governor Josh Shapiro has signaled a willingness to explore diverse energy solutions, working with bipartisan efforts to advance energy projects.
Burgum’s concerns resonate with a broader narrative about the U.S. losing ground in energy production, especially in the face of increasing competition from countries like China. He noted the U.S. has let its expertise in rare earth elements dwindle, allowing foreign nations to take the lead in this critical area. “We have to get back in it,” he implored, as he pointed out that educational initiatives in the materials sciences are lagging.
Overall, the dialogue surrounding energy policy underscores a clash between regulatory approaches in blue states and calls for greater national energy independence. As Burgum and Wright articulate their vision for a more self-reliant energy future, the stakes remain high—not only for energy prices but also for national security.
"*" indicates required fields
