Intensifying Calls for Voter Roll Audits in Minnesota Amid Fraud Allegations
Recent allegations regarding voter fraud in Minnesota are reigniting discussions surrounding the state’s election integrity. As scrutiny increases, critics are drawing parallels to documented failures in other states, raising concerns about the adequacy of Minnesota’s voter registration processes.
A tweet that gained substantial traction recently called for a thorough audit of Minnesota’s voter rolls. This tweet accused groups linked to the Somali community of exploiting the registration system to secure fraudulent votes for Democrats. The allegations also extend to the misuse of taxpayer-funded benefits, including commercial driver’s licenses for noncitizens and instances of illegal voting.
“We need a FULL AUDIT of Minnesota’s voter rolls,” the tweet stated. “Somalian-linked groups have been caught committing voter fraud by registering fraudulent Democrat voters. They steal taxpayer dollars. They give illegals CDLs. And they illegally vote.”
The urgency of these claims echoes concerns voiced by officials in neighboring states such as Oregon. Recently, Oregon authorities disclosed that 302 noncitizens were improperly registered to vote, a mistake attributed to clerical errors and software malfunctions at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Since 2021, Oregon has reported a total of 1,561 such erroneous registrations.
This issue arose in Oregon under the state’s “Motor Voter” law, which automatically registers individuals to vote during driver’s license applications or renewals. A 2019 law allowing noncitizens to obtain licenses sometimes resulted in DMV employees misclassifying foreign IDs as valid U.S. documentation. As a result, ineligible individuals received automatic voter registration.
LaVonne Griffin-Valade, Oregon’s Secretary of State, acknowledged the seriousness of the situation. “Thanks to the swift action of elections officials, I have full confidence that these new errors will not impact the 2024 election,” she asserted. However, the situation emphasizes the need for third-party audits to enhance transparency and accountability.
In Minnesota, similar worries linger despite not having a documented history of voter fraud on the same scale as Oregon. Critics assert that the state lacks transparency and effective oversight mechanisms. The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database records incidents of illegal voting and fraudulent registration in Minnesota, albeit with less frequency compared to Oregon.
This year, Minnesota enacted laws enabling illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. Advocates claim this improves road safety and fosters immigrant integration; yet opposition voices caution it could lead to abuse of the voting system, particularly without robust citizenship verification tied to licensing.
Minnesota is also part of the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a multi-state initiative designed to maintain clean voter rolls. However, critics of ERIC argue that it lacks necessary oversight and may inadvertently obscure instances of voter fraud.
Reporting reveals that left-leaning nonprofits with connections to diverse communities are heavily involved in local civic activities within Minneapolis and St. Paul. While many of these groups offer valuable services, evidence suggests some manipulate voter registration drives. Whistleblower accounts and undercover investigations indicate illegal practices, such as registering individuals at false addresses or incentivizing them to vote for specific candidates.
These tactics remind us of controversies in other states. In Georgia, footage from 2020 caught individuals dropping off large stacks of ballots late at night. Wisconsin investigators found numerous cases of ballots issued to nursing home residents without proper consent. Such incidents further illustrate vulnerabilities within the election system.
These various cases fuel calls for reforms aimed at enhancing election integrity, including audits, voter ID laws, stricter proof of citizenship requirements, and limitations on third-party handling of ballots. However, Minnesota has expanded registration access without implementing stronger verification measures.
Proponents of a voter roll audit in Minnesota reference Oregon’s corrective steps as evidence that such assessments are both feasible and necessary. After facing scrutiny, Oregon updated its software, adjusted dropdown menus to avoid misclassifications, and mandated new verification prompts during ID applications. The Secretary of State also appointed a new Motor Voter oversight specialist to improve monitoring of suspicious registrations.
In Oregon, 178 of the 302 recently identified registrations involved residents from American Samoa, a territory whose nationals are ineligible to vote under federal law. Such registrations remained undetected for years due to software failures that conflated U.S. citizenship with U.S. nationality. The problem was only revealed through data-sharing reviews and external audits.
In contrast, Minnesota has not confirmed whether its systems can reliably differentiate similar classifications, nor has the Secretary of State’s office clarified the existence of routine citizenship audits. This lack of transparency has prompted local officials and independent watchdogs to demand clarity before the upcoming election.
“What happened in Oregon is not unique,” remarked an election policy consultant. “Every state with automatic registration and no hard citizenship check is at risk.” The implications are significant if reliance on DMV clerks for citizenship determinations goes unchecked, especially without an audit trail or verification layer.
Presently, Minnesota has not authorized a formal audit of its voter rolls. State officials assert that their controls are adequate; yet critics argue that combining extensive registration access, foreign-language outreach, and weak verification procedures creates opportunities for manipulation, chiefly from organized networks with interconnected social and political ties.
“This isn’t just about people voting when they shouldn’t,” another policy analyst noted. “It’s about the system being fundamentally unable to tell the difference between legal and illegal registrations. If Oregon acknowledged 1,500 errors, what might be concealed in the data here in Minnesota?”
In light of growing concerns, Republican lawmakers in Minnesota have renewed demands for proactive legislation mandating voter ID laws and requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for registration, beyond mere sworn statements. However, these initiatives have faced consistent opposition from Democratic legislators who view them as unnecessary and discriminatory.
As Minnesota prepares for a critical role in the 2024 elections, watchdog organizations highlight the urgency for the state to restore public trust in its electoral system. The choice to implement reforms or maintain the status quo could significantly influence voter confidence when it’s time to count ballots next November.
"*" indicates required fields
