The city of Chicago is grappling with a severe financial crisis, one that has been exacerbated by recent legislative actions taken by Illinois Democratic Governor J.B. Pritzker. For years, Chicago has been known as a sanctuary city, attracting individuals who have entered the country without authorization. Now, the fiscal stability of this city is in jeopardy. The economic decisions made by Pritzker may lead Chicago into a state of financial despair that few could have imagined.
Pritzker’s legislation, signed into law in August, has drawn criticism as one of the most financially unsound measures in Illinois history. It offers pension “sweeteners” to police officers and firefighters hired after 2011, which many economists estimate will create an enormous $11 billion in new liabilities. This new debt reduces the funded ratio of the city’s pensions for these public servants to a mere 18 percent. Such figures illustrate a staggering reality: for every dollar owed, Chicago has just 18 cents available.
Chicago’s pension predicament is dire. According to reports, the city is shouldering more pension debt than 43 states combined and holds the distinction of having seven of the ten worst-funded local pension systems in the nation. The burden of pension obligations consumes a larger share of the budget than in any other major city in the U.S. Furthermore, Chicago grapples with the worst credit rating of any city in the country. As the new pension sweeteners take effect, it is likely that further downgrades will lead to junk status for Chicago, complicating its ability to fund essential services such as education and public safety.
The structural issues of the state’s pension system are compounded by a constitutional “pension protection” clause, which severely limits the ability of lawmakers to make cuts to pension benefits. Once these sweeteners are in place, officials will have little recourse to amend or reduce them, regardless of the fiscal realities or voter sentiment. Chicago residents will be left bearing the financial weight of commitments that elected officials made years before they left office.
City Journal points out the gravity of this situation by highlighting that even drastic measures, such as eliminating the successful summer youth jobs program costing $52 million annually, would not suffice. The new pension benefits alone are expected to cost $60 million in 2026 and skyrocket to $753 million per year by 2025. With such looming expenses, future financial planning appears increasingly bleak.
In light of these challenges, the road ahead for Chicago seems fraught with difficulty. Observers suggest that state leaders should consider legislative changes to enable municipalities to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy—a strategy already permitted in 24 other states. Doing so could allow Chicago to renegotiate pension contracts, as federal Bankruptcy Code would take precedence over the Illinois constitution’s pension protections.
Bankruptcy could also give the city a chance to reexamine other dubious fiscal arrangements. Currently, Chicago has been relying on sales-tax bonds, which have surpassed general-obligation bonds. This maneuver means dedicated revenues will continue to flow to bondholders even if bankruptcy occurs. With that in mind, proposals for appointing a receiver or emergency manager, or establishing a “Tier 3” retirement plan for new public employees—offering a 401(k) style benefit—may be steps towards addressing some of these overwhelming financial challenges.
As Chicago faces its most significant financial turbulence, the decisions made today will have repercussions for generations. Without a clear strategy and reform, the city’s fiscal future hangs in the balance, a cautionary tale of how quickly economic circumstances can shift under the weight of legislative actions and long-term commitments.
"*" indicates required fields
