The situation for Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is precarious, highlighted by unusual criticism from the typically left-leaning Washington Post. When an outlet that often aligns with Democrat views publishes an editorial calling out a mayor’s budget proposal, it signals significant trouble ahead. The editorial board expresses deep concern over Johnson’s plans, particularly the issue of unfunded liabilities in the city’s pension programs.
The Post describes Johnson’s approach as a mere financial band-aid rather than a comprehensive solution. Johnson’s intentions to create new taxes and raise existing ones are portrayed as short-sighted measures destined to fail in addressing the city’s long-standing fiscal issues. The Washington Post points out, “Chicago has lost its mind,” emphasizing the severity of the financial mismanagement under current and past administrations.
Chicago’s financial woes are not new. The city has a troubling history of using temporary solutions to tackle persistent problems. A notable example is the 2008 deal that sold off 75 years of future parking meter revenue for $1.15 billion, a decision that continues to haunt the city’s finances. The editorial posits that such misguided strategies should have prompted local leaders to seek genuine fiscal reform, yet the cycle of ineffective fixes persists.
From 2019 to 2025, the city’s net operating budget saw a significant increase of nearly 40%, significantly bolstered by temporary federal pandemic funding. As noted by Grant McClintock from the Civic Federation, this influx of federal dollars disguised underlying economic weaknesses. With the pandemic now behind us, the loss of funding exposes the unsustainable nature of many programs and positions created during that time.
In an effort to bridge a staggering $1.15 billion shortfall, Mayor Johnson is proposing a host of new taxes that target the very businesses that sustain Chicago’s economy. He aims to raise the tax on the lease of personal property such as computers and vehicles from 11 percent to 14 percent and reinstate a “head tax” that would charge large employers $33 per worker each month. Critics argue this will only deter businesses from operating in the city and hinder economic growth, particularly stark in light of the Chicago Fed’s dim hiring outlook—the weakest since the pandemic.
The governor has also weighed in, indicating that such a head tax would ultimately penalize job creation. When questioned about these proposals during a press conference, Johnson dismissed the editorial’s criticisms, asserting that the information was incorrect and implying a history of inaccuracies from the publication. Johnson’s response sheds light on his defiance, reflecting a disconnect between his administration and the external pressures of fiscal responsibility.
Given the scrutiny from the Washington Post and the broader context of Chicago’s fiscal challenges, one can’t help but wonder how Johnson’s leadership compares to that of former mayor Lori Lightfoot. While Lightfoot faced her share of harsh judgments, the current assessment suggests that Johnson struggles to present a more effective approach, raising questions about the sustainability of his tax policies and the overall direction of the city’s economic future.
Brandon Johnson’s proposals might represent a desperate attempt to manage an impending crisis, but the reliance on traditional political strategies—raising taxes and borrowing—might not prove sufficient. The critical spotlight from an unlikely source like the Washington Post could indicate that public frustration is mounting, and the mayor will need more than mere rhetoric to navigate the storm ahead.
"*" indicates required fields
