In a recent piece, Politico’s Hannah Roberts takes a deep dive into the intersections of Christmas and politics in Europe, raising eyebrows with her claims regarding the holiday’s appropriation by right-wing parties. The article suggests that Christmas is seen as pivotal in the fight against a leftist cultural tide, with various conservative figures positioning themselves as its protectors. This framing begs the question: what exactly has Christmas been co-opted from? It’s hard to ignore its foundational meaning as the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ.
Roberts implies that conservatives paint the holiday as a marker of Christian civilization, struggling in the face of a secular left that wishes to dilute its essence. She cites leaders like Giorgia Meloni and parties such as France’s National Rally, arguing they have claimed ownership of Christmas in the political landscape. What emerges from her analysis is a striking contrast between the approaches of left and right; while conservatives celebrate the holiday’s Christian roots, the left tends to avoid directly invoking Christmas, opting instead for more neutral language like “holiday season.” This tactic, according to Roberts, stems from discomfort with public expressions of religion in progressive circles, positioning those on the right as defenders against what she describes as cultural self-loathing.
However, this raises a larger question about the very nature of Christmas amidst significant shifts in demographic and cultural landscapes across Europe. Roberts touches on the impact of immigration, specifically pointing to the Muslim community, showcasing the left’s attempt to adjust Christmas’s narrative to fit a more inclusive societal vision. Yet this raises concerns for those who see Christmas under threat from these changes. For many, the holiday is not merely a festive occasion but a pillar of identity and tradition. The framing of a supposed war on Christmas resonates deeply with those who feel that their heritage is being overlooked or actively dismantled.
Interestingly, Roberts’ portrayal may reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of the fervent attachment many people have toward Christmas as a Christian holiday. She hints at the rise of conservative platforms that claim a defense of Christmas as central to their identities. Critics of Roberts might argue that her critique misses the point entirely; it may not be about ‘stealing’ Christmas but about ensuring its survival in a rapidly changing cultural landscape. As the article suggests, the gravity of Christmas’s meaning compels those who cherish it to take a stand.
The piece concludes by accusing Politico of ignorance regarding essential truths—the idea that Christmas is inherently a Christian celebration stands at the core of the discourse, regardless of political undertones. Just as food is a product of farms—a straightforward fact—Christmas is fundamentally about the birth of Christ. In that sense, the need for champions of the holiday feels more pressing than ever amidst debates about its significance, especially when some narratives aim to dilute or alter its Christian heritage in favor of broader inclusivity.
In sum, Roberts’ article serves as a backdrop to a larger conversation about tradition, identity, and the spaces where they intersect with modern political dynamics. It sheds light on the tensions swirling around Christmas in contemporary discourse and showcases an apparent divide over its very nature and meaning. Whether one sides with the critics or proponents of these arguments, it’s clear that discussions surrounding Christmas are anything but simple.
"*" indicates required fields
