On Saturday, a handful of demonstrators dressed as characters from The Handmaid’s Tale gathered outside Trump Tower in New York. Armed with raised middle fingers and silent gestures, they aimed to make a political statement. However, their intentions may have missed the mark, as reactions from onlookers pointed to a disconnect between their message and public perception.
The protest was one of many smaller demonstrations opposing former President Donald Trump’s second term. Activists used the gathering to symbolize fears about women’s rights and democracy under his leadership. Yet, the effectiveness of such symbolism is being questioned across the political spectrum.
A tweet from a conservative commentator captured this sentiment: ‘NOW: Deranged leftists dressed as handmaids are spending their day flipping off Trump Tower in NYC… Keep up this cringey bullsht, liberals! I’m sure you’re winning over a TON of Americans with this stuff 🤣.’ This reflects an overarching critique—that such protests may alienate more than attract support.
This gathering is part of a broader trend of creatively themed protests aimed at Trump since he first entered the political arena in 2015. While significant protests like the Women’s March in 2017 drew millions, smaller events often lack the energy to create substantial impact. The Trump Tower protest fits into this smaller category, recycling imagery familiar from past demonstrations without compelling political results.
According to one passerby, ‘This costume protest has become so overused, it’s hard to tell if they’re trying to make a point or just trying to be noticed.’ Another observer noted, ‘I’m not even sure what they’re protesting today. It all feels very disconnected.’ Such comments underscore the challenge of communicating a clear message in a format that some perceive as theatrical rather than substantive.
Contrast this with the ‘No Kings’ protest in October 2024, which engaged an estimated 7 million people across the country. That event emphasized critical constitutional issues and attracted a diverse crowd, including families and veterans. Its peaceful and organized nature showcased a blueprint for effective political engagement—one rooted in clear grievances. In comparison, the spectacle at Trump Tower seemed less focused and more performative.
A Pew Research Center study highlights that over 60% of Americans are less likely to back protests characterized by theatrical displays. Many working-class voters, particularly those over 50, view such demonstrations as disconnected from their realities. This perspective aligns with reactions to the recent protest, suggesting that performance art may not resonate with those looking for serious political discourse.
Despite the continued use of the ‘Handmaid’ protests, there’s little evidence they have swayed public opinion or led to meaningful policy changes. Recent Gallup polling noted a slight rise in approval for Trump among independent voters following earlier anti-Trump demonstrations. This suggests that the ‘Handmaid’ protests may actually reinforce the support of those who back him, rather than persuade skeptics.
Critics argue that these character-driven protests inadvertently validate Trump’s claims that opposition is more a matter of performance than serious policy disagreement. The image of hooded figures raising middle fingers may further cement his base’s loyalty rather than draw in undecided voters. One media analyst remarked, ‘What we’re seeing isn’t civic protest; it’s performance art masquerading as activism.’ This raises the question of how these protests relate to the economic and social concerns of everyday Americans.
Meanwhile, Trump was not in New York during the protest but instead spent the weekend in Palm Beach, Florida. His office did not comment on the demonstration, although he has previously criticized similar gatherings as ‘sad, desperate people.’
No arrests or major incidents occurred at the Trump Tower protest, and the small group dispersed without significant confrontation. While social media captured the event, it garnered more online attention than real community engagement. As one observer noted, the protest provided little for the public to interpret, becoming more an object of mockery than a means for change.
Strategic discussions among political advisors reveal tensions within the left about how best to approach protests. A leaked memo from a progressive PAC cautioned against aligning with theatrical disruptions, highlighting the risk of alienating moderates and working-class voters. Instead, grassroots activism focused on pressing policy issues may hold more promise for building genuine support.
Looking ahead to the 2026 midterm elections, a split emerges on the left between those advocating for broad civic engagement and those favoring less serious, symbolic protests. Historical trends and polling data suggest that engaging the public in a meaningful way tends to foster lasting shifts in opinion. Events like ‘No Kings’ demonstrate how focused, policy-driven protests can unite and mobilize a diverse audience.
Ultimately, Saturday’s event outside Trump Tower stands as a reminder that meaningful protest requires more than spectacle. It represents a moment rather than a movement. While some may find solace in the theatrics, many others find confusion. For much of America, it signifies the diminishing appeal of political theater.
"*" indicates required fields
