Identity theft, particularly involving illegal immigrants, isn’t just a theoretical crime; it impacts real Americans profoundly. More than one million citizens may unknowingly be tied to second jobs performed by unauthorized immigrants using their Social Security numbers. For instance, a Minnesota factory worker found himself burdened with tax liabilities because an illegal immigrant in Missouri had been working under his name for years. Similarly, Iowa taxpayers were shocked to learn that the Des Moines school superintendent was an illegal immigrant facing deportation. These examples illustrate a troubling trend of identity theft that often remains hidden until it causes significant financial and emotional strain on victims.
Experts like Ron Mortensen, a retired Foreign Service officer, highlight that identity theft is far from victimless. “When someone gets your or your child’s Social Security number, that is no longer a victimless crime,” Mortensen stated. This sentiment underscores the real harm wreaked by these offenses, as many victims may never know their identity has been compromised. Such theft can lead not only to financial distress but also emotional upheaval, showing that the implications extend beyond mere statistics.
E-Verify, the federal system designed to validate the work eligibility of applicants, has been in place since 1997, but its effectiveness is under scrutiny. While most experts view it as a significant deterrent against identity fraud, it is not without flaws. Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies remarked, “E-Verify isn’t foolproof, but it’s actually pretty good for a government program.” However, E-Verify’s utility is limited, as it is mandatory only in certain contexts, with most states allowing it on a voluntary basis. For example, California and Illinois actively discourage its use, thereby allowing gaps through which illegal immigrants can still slip into the job market.
Despite E-Verify’s increasing utilization—growing from a mere 250,000 employers in 2011 to over 1.4 million today—its mandatory application remains sporadic. The inefficiencies are particularly glaring; incidents like the head of the Des Moines school board admitting it does not utilize E-Verify for checking applicants further illustrate the holes in the system. Proposals have emerged over the years to make E-Verify mandatory for all employers, but none have secured the necessary support in Congress.
Another concern revolves around the ease with which personal information can be acquired by criminals. With data breaches becoming more common—such as the 2013 Yahoo breach affecting billions of people—the likelihood of individuals’ personal data being available for illicit purposes is high. In FY 2024 alone, the Social Security Administration’s Inspector General received over 78,000 allegations of misuse of Social Security numbers. The increase in the “Earnings Suspense File,” which tracks taxes collected that cannot be matched to valid Social Security records, indicates that identity theft linked to illegal immigration is on the rise.
The complexity of prosecuting identity theft only enriches this discussion. Recent Supreme Court rulings tightened the scope of what constitutes aggravated identity theft. For instance, without demonstrating that the individual using the stolen information was aware of the theft, the charges may not suffice, limiting effective recourse for victims. Despite this legal environment, U.S. Attorney’s offices continue to document cases of aggravated identity theft across the country.
Employers not using E-Verify face severe vulnerabilities. Experts have noted an alarming rise in the sophistication of fraudulent documents. Bob Griggs, who runs a company specializing in I-9 compliance, observed, “It’s no longer a cottage industry; it’s a mansion industry.” The channels through which personal data is stolen have expanded as well, with children’s identities particularly at risk due to the lack of regular financial reporting.
Some states refuse to mandate E-Verify due to ideological beliefs, but economic arguments are also at play. Critics often cite potential instability in low-wage labor markets. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which initially opposed E-Verify, has since adapted its stance, particularly following a Supreme Court ruling in 2021 that upheld mandatory use in Arizona. These economic concerns continue to fuel debate regarding E-Verify’s broader application.
Despite widespread fears that E-Verify might stifle job creation, states that implemented it, such as South Carolina and Georgia, have reported positive trends. South Carolina’s GDP rose significantly, and the unemployment rate plummeted since it mandated E-Verify. Similarly, Georgia’s economy thrived, showcasing that such regulations can coexist with economic growth.
Improving E-Verify remains critical to curbing identity theft. Experts suggest integrating E-Verify with state motor vehicle records could enhance its reliability by introducing photo identification. Some states already allow illegal immigrants to obtain valid driver’s licenses, which complicates matters further. The accuracy of identity verification is essential, and adding layers of authentication can help bolster the system against increasingly advanced counterfeiting tactics.
The intersection of illegal immigration and identity theft presents complex challenges. Stronger measures, including establishing robust verification systems and increasing enforcement of existing laws, are necessary to protect American citizens from the repercussions of identity theft. The burden of proof lies not only with victims but also with the institutions that should safeguard their identities—highlighting an urgent need for technological and legislative reform.
"*" indicates required fields
