Analysis: The Impact of Language Proficiency Standards on Road Safety
The recent viral video capturing a woman refusing to assist a non-English-speaking truck driver highlights a pressing issue regarding language proficiency among commercial drivers. The incident underscores broader questions about safety and the ability of drivers to operate large vehicles effectively. The woman’s firm stance—“If you don’t understand, I CANNOT help you!”—reflects a growing sentiment that language barriers can pose significant risks on the road.
Tragic incidents lend weight to this argument. The fatal crash involving Harjinder Singh, who previously failed an English proficiency test but managed to communicate to some extent during a traffic stop, raises concerns about the effectiveness of current enforcement measures. The contradiction between Singh’s communication skills and his test results illustrates a gap in standards that must be addressed. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy points out the inadequacies, stating, “This driver in Florida had received a CDL in Washington, California, and was pulled over in July for speeding, and no doubt couldn’t speak the English language.” Such inconsistencies raise concerns about how federal policies are applied across varying jurisdictions.
Historically, the law mandates that commercial drivers must be able to read and speak English adequately to ensure safe communication with the public and to understand critical traffic signs. However, critics assert that this requirement has often been overlooked, particularly in states with more lenient licensing processes. The consequences of this negligence manifest in accidents where drivers who are unable to read English signs have caused fatalities, as seen in the cases of Connor Dzion and Tyeler Harris. Their deaths highlight how a lack of language proficiency can quickly become a matter of life and death.
The federal push to enforce these language standards has intensified recently, particularly under the current administration. The executive order issued by President Trump in April 2025 has led to the removal of thousands of drivers who do not meet the language proficiency criteria. An estimated 9,500 drivers have been affected, echoing a significant shift in policy that seeks to prioritize road safety. However, this crackdown has sparked controversy. California and other states risk losing federal funding, dramatically changing the enforcement landscape.
Voices from the trucking industry, such as Mark Colson, CEO of the Alabama Trucking Association, emphasize the connection between language skills and safety. He states, “It’s all about safety, it’s all about being able to read the rules of the road, being able to communicate with law enforcement and the general public.” This viewpoint is echoed by bilingual truckers like Jose Reyes, who often find themselves translating during emergencies. Reyes highlights the current reality: drivers relying on tools like Google Translate to navigate critical situations can lead to dangerous outcomes.
Yet, the move to enforce English proficiency has drawn criticism. Civil rights advocates fear these policies could lead to discrimination. Josh Rosenthal, an attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, warns that the stringent standards might overlook individuals who can understand and communicate effectively in English, potentially leading to bias against certain communities.
Economically, the ramifications of these stricter rules are already being felt. Businesses are concerned about losing a significant number of drivers—estimated at 400,000—due to the new requirements. Freight delays and increased costs may follow, particularly affecting sectors relying on long-haul transportation. Company owners like Vadym Shpak note that often the issue isn’t the ability to drive safely but rather minor language proficiency challenges that could be worked through with training.
Despite the valid concerns about safety and language proficiency, the intersection of these policies with immigration status complicates matters further. While federal agencies assert that the regulations focus on safety, the disproportionate impact on immigrant drivers is hard to ignore. The former trucker from Myanmar, referred to as Thaw, illustrates the difficulties faced by those whose work options diminish under these stringent rules.
Law enforcement now has the authority to evaluate a driver’s English skills during roadside inspections. If they cannot communicate essential information, officers can issue citations and prevent drivers from continuing their trips, further reinforcing the importance of effective communication on the road.
The renewed emphasis on language standards signifies a reversal of policies from the Obama administration. By re-establishing these criteria, the Trump administration aims to clarify what constitutes safe driving practices. As Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated, “American roads need to be safe. If that means changing who gets to drive, then so be it.”
The proposed bipartisan legislation, known as “Connor’s Law,” aims to codify these English proficiency standards into law, making it clear that noncompliance could lead to disqualification for a commercial driver’s license. This legislative move reflects a critical need for clarity and accountability in maintaining safety on America’s roads.
Amid these debates, the actions of everyday citizens—such as the woman in the viral video—serve as a reminder of the importance of safety. As discussions progress regarding the balance between the economy, immigration policy, and public safety, one thing is clear: effective communication is essential when steering heavy machinery on the nation’s highways. The need for clear language and understanding will remain central to safeguarding lives on the road.
"*" indicates required fields
