U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has made significant moves in the contentious case surrounding Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia. On Monday, she extended a temporary restraining order, halting the Trump administration from re-detaining Garcia. This decision comes amid ongoing complications for the government, which has yet to provide a final removal order necessary for Garcia’s deportation.
During the latest hearing, Judge Xinis expressed her frustration over the government’s lack of clarity regarding the status of Garcia’s deportation. Her concerns were evident as she attempted to understand why Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could not produce the required documents. “I don’t know what the government’s position is,” she remarked, reflecting her exasperation at the situation.
Xinis has been presiding over Garcia’s civil case since March, and her patience is wearing thin. She reiterated the importance of having a final removal order, stating that without it, Garcia could not be lawfully detained. This legal stalemate showcases the challenge of navigating the complexities of immigration law and the responsibilities of federal agencies.
The judge’s commitment to resolving the matter quickly was clear as she set a deadline for the Justice Department to provide additional documentation related to Garcia’s removal plans. She expects this information by the day after Christmas and has instructed the plaintiffs to submit their details by the end of the month. Garcia’s legal team maintains that Costa Rica is his preferred destination for removal, as the country previously agreed to accept him.
Xinis pointed out discrepancies in the government’s claims regarding Costa Rica’s willingness to accept Garcia. The court’s earlier discussions indicated that officials had misrepresented the status of Costa Rica’s offer, a serious concern for the judge. She firmly stated that the government’s actions seem more focused on creating barriers to Garcia’s removal rather than facilitating it in a straightforward manner.
Throughout the proceedings, Judge Xinis voiced her growing anxiety about the possibility of illegal detention practices. She mentioned fearing that the administration might try to detain Garcia “in the middle of the night” without proper legal processes. This comment underscores her commitment to upholding due process, an essential aspect of the American legal system.
Frustration was palpable again when Xinis recounted the difficulty the court has faced in obtaining information from ICE over the past five months. She voiced her disbelief at the representations made by the government and indicated they bordered on bad faith. “I’m again making a finding that these representations, which are misrepresentations – are in bad faith,” she told the government lawyers. Her words highlight a serious distrust of how the administration is handling Garcia’s case.
Monday’s hearing concluded with Garcia in attendance, a notable moment amid a backdrop of intense legal battles and public interest. He took time to address supporters outside the courthouse, further illustrating the deeply personal stakes of his situation. Since his initial deportation in March—an act acknowledged by Trump administration officials as an “administrative error”—Garcia’s case has become a focal point in the larger conversation about immigration practices and the responsibilities of federal authorities.
In summary, Judge Xinis continues to navigate a complex legal environment as she seeks a resolution in Garcia’s case. Her rulings reflect a strong commitment to due process and an insistence on transparency from the government. As the situation develops, all eyes remain on how the legal framework will deal with the administration’s missteps and the future of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"*" indicates required fields
