Kamala Harris’s Potential 2028 Bid: An Internal Challenge for the Democrats
Vice President Kamala Harris is gearing up for a presidential run in 2028, but her ambition is met with skepticism from party insiders and financial backers. Despite laying the groundwork for a campaign, troubling memories of her previous electoral defeat loom large. Reports reveal a divide between her enthusiasm and the unease among key Democratic figures, as indicated by Axios, which noted the mixed reactions in political circles and on social media.
Harris has been busy promoting her upcoming memoir, 107 Days, and actively engaging with party members and donors. Her presence at events like the Democratic National Committee (DNC) winter meeting demonstrates a desire to recapture the party’s trust, asserting, “Government is viewed as fundamentally unable to meet the needs of its people.” Harris claims that Americans are ready for change, a sentiment echoed by a supportive audience member who declared, “You!” in response to her question about the future.
Yet, the comfort these words bring contrasts sharply with the concerns within party leadership. Harris’s 2024 campaign ended in disappointment, marked by significant fundraising but no victories in critical swing states. An aide reflected on this disconnect, asking, “How do you raise a historic amount of money and not win a single swing state? The honest answer is: I don’t know.” The aftermath of that loss continues to challenge her return to national politics.
Financial oversight also remains a sticking point. DNC Chair Jaime Harrison has raised alarms about Harris’s financial strategy, noting that her campaign spent a whopping $530 million on advertising—almost double what her opponent, Trump, allocated. The atmosphere is further complicated by costly events, such as a million-dollar town hall produced by Oprah Winfrey, which created discomfort among veteran party leaders.
The lingering fallout extends to Harris’s approach with campaign infrastructure. For example, her fundraising efforts through the Harris Victory Fund, utilizing party-associated email lists to promote her memoir, have raised eyebrows. While lawful, the optics of such moves draw scrutiny, suggesting a risk of pushing the party into a corner too soon.
Moreover, the tone of Harris’s messages seems to reflect her awareness of these challenges. At a United Farm Workers gala, she was introduced with an eye on the future. However, her efforts to rehabilitate her image may highlight the fissures in party support, as potential rivals like Gavin Newsom remain ambiguous about embracing her leadership.
Policy discussions within the party further underscore the strategic missteps of the last election cycle. The effectiveness of the Future Forward PAC, linked to the Biden-Harris campaign, is being questioned due to its late-stage spending approach that failed to adequately engage voters earlier. One operative pointedly noted, “They’re sitting on a pile of money while voters are making up their minds in spring.” This critique hints at a demand for a more comprehensive electoral strategy moving forward.
The prospect of competition looms large. With Harris opting out of a gubernatorial run in California, this may create space for others, like Wes Moore and Pete Buttigieg, each of whom could challenge her for the Democratic nomination. This potential rivalry adds another layer of complexity to Harris’s ambitions.
Polls taken before the 2024 Democratic Convention showed Harris performing reasonably well against Trump, particularly among women and younger independents. However, those numbers faded post-campaign, following difficulties during her electoral run, particularly when Trump declined to debate her a second time.
Despite the clouds of doubt, some still staunchly support Harris. Rep. James Clyburn expressed that the party should bolster her candidacy, citing her unique position as a trailblazer. Nonetheless, inside the DNC, worries are brewing. Concerns about the ramifications of a single super PAC managing campaign strategies are growing, signaling a need for broader engagement from the party.
Harris is navigating a delicate political landscape, attempting to carve out a populist position that resonates with the party’s core while also appealing to a wider audience. Her recent rhetoric challenges established norms, calling for a shift away from the “nostalgic” approach toward leadership that many believe has failed constituents. “We cannot afford to be nostalgic for a flawed system that failed so many,” she boldly stated, emphasizing a need for a radical recalibration.
The effectiveness of her strategy remains uncertain, particularly as mockery and doubt ripple through social media. With comments like “LMAO, DO IT! JD is rubbing his hands together as we speak,” skepticism about her candidacy is evident, suggesting that Harris’s climb back to prominence will not come without challenges. The road ahead is formidable, fraught with internal party dynamics and the ever-present shadow of past failures.
"*" indicates required fields
