Former Vice President Kamala Harris has taken a bold stance, claiming her place in history as a “historic figure” during a recent interview with The New York Times. This declaration comes alongside a notable announcement: a marble bust of Harris will be constructed and placed in Congress, a tradition that celebrates former vice presidents and dates back to the late 1800s. “I understand the focus on ’28 and all that,” she stated, reaffirming her belief in her significance. Harris frames herself in the illustrious company of every vice president who has ever served.
Her confidence shines through as she embraces a bustling book tour for her upcoming release, “107 Days.” “Thousands of people are coming to hear my voice. Thousands and thousands,” she boasted about the sold-out events. Yet, beneath this celebration of success, Harris has used the spotlight to direct criticism at members of her own party, including Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and even President Biden.
In her book, Harris alleges that Shapiro was overly eager to involve himself in every decision, reminding him, “a vice president is not a co-president.” This assertion appeared to ignite a firestorm of backlash from Shapiro, who labeled her claims as “complete and utter bull—-.” His spirited defense illustrates the tensions brewing within the Democratic Party, as allies become adversaries under the pressure of political narratives. Shapiro added, “Wouldn’t you ask questions if someone was talking to you about forming a partnership and working together?” His remarks underscore the careful navigation often required in political relationships.
Harris’s decision to choose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate over Shapiro also raises eyebrows. The fallout from this decision has been publicly scrutinized, with Shapiro’s denunciation echoed by political observers who question her judgment in the selection process. In what appears to be an effort to shore up support and credibility, Harris may be balancing historical recognition with the reality of her relationships within the party.
Furthermore, her book does not shy away from addressing her contentious relationship with the Biden administration. Harris criticizes the White House for sidelining her, suggesting that they were content to allow her to “shoulder the blame” for ongoing challenges, particularly concerning the border crisis. “Getting anything positive said about my work or any defense against untrue attacks was almost impossible,” she claimed, evidencing a vulnerability beneath her bravado.
This self-reflection could signal a longing for a validation that Harris has not received during her time in office. As she navigates the political landscape, her statements reveal both a desire for recognition and a strategy to reclaim her narrative. By sharing her experiences through her book, Harris seeks to cement her legacy while confronting the criticisms that have followed her, both from allies and opponents.
Kamala Harris stands at a crossroads, intricately weaving her personal story with broader political themes. As she asserts her historical significance and addresses past grievances, her actions and words resonate within a landscape marked by fierce loyalty and rivalry. The marble bust may be symbolic of her achievements, but the journey to securing her legacy is fraught with challenges that extend far beyond its polished surface.
"*" indicates required fields
