Last month, Lake Street Church of Evanston, Illinois, displayed a “Nativity” scene that many view as a grotesque distortion of a sacred moment. This installation attempted to link the Holy Family’s flight to Egypt with contemporary immigration issues, showcasing baby Jesus with zip ties on his wrists—an unsettling image meant to evoke the actions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The church’s self-serving portrayal poses a serious question: How can individuals who identify as Christians so blatantly politicize the birth of Christ?
The church claimed its goal was to draw “direct parallels” between the Holy Family’s refugee experience and modern immigration detention practices. However, using the Nativity to convey a political message trivializes the significance of Christ’s birth. The scene, declaring itself a statement against ICE’s enforcement actions, asserts that “enforcement terror does not discriminate by documentation status.” But this conflation of faith and social justice raises alarms about the intentions behind such overt displays.
Key figures in the church, including Pastor Michael Woolf, seem to embrace a narrative steeped in political activism rather than spiritual truth. The Nativity scene also featured Mary and Joseph wearing gas masks, a clear reference to the chemical weapons used against protestors. This choice reveals a deep-seated contempt for law enforcement and an agenda that prioritizes ideological warfare over genuine worship.
Pastor Woolf’s own actions reflect this troubling trend. A recent arrest by ICE, which intersected with his church’s controversial messaging, does not provide the narrative of martyrdom some may expect. Instead, it highlights the perils of intertwining political beliefs with sacred faith. It is alarming when those who preach fall into the very prideful trap the Apostle Paul warned against: the temptation to gather teachers who validate personal opinions rather than sound doctrine.
While the church’s approach might resonate with some, it alienates true believers seeking spiritual nourishment during a season meant for reflection. The Nativity’s profound truth—God entering the world to redeem humanity—is eclipsed by a display focused on modern grievances, demonstrating a lack of reverence for the divine mystery of Christ’s incarnation.
Furthermore, one must ponder the implications of representing the birth of Christ through the lens of contemporary controversies. The act of using the Nativity as a political prop veers dangerously close to blasphemy, overshadowing the purpose of the Christmas celebration. If one were to entertain the notion of supporting a politically charged Nativity scene, the very essence of the message would be compromised. It demonstrates a troubling mindset that prioritizes human opinion over divine revelation.
The church’s choices provoke a strong response, not only because of their political nature but also because they distort the foundational beliefs of Christianity. It raises the question of what it truly means to embody the faith. The pride and self-righteousness exhibited are unsettling and warrant careful reflection, especially for those professing to represent Christ.
In conclusion, the Lake Street Church’s distorted Nativity scene serves as a stark reminder of the perilous intersection of faith and political ideology. It challenges the essence of the Christmas message and, ultimately, leads to a divergence from the core of Christianity. Discerning believers must seek to uphold the sanctity of the Nativity, resisting the lure of using religious symbols for self-serving political narratives.
"*" indicates required fields
