Lorenzo Lamas, a Hollywood figure with a legacy in action films, is making headlines with his endorsement of Chad Bianco, the Riverside Sheriff and Republican candidate for California governor. Lamas doesn’t hold back when assessing the state’s current leadership, declaring the impact of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration as “devastating.” His remarks reflect a growing frustration among Californians about the state’s path.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Lamas articulated his concerns about the mismanagement of California, a state rich in resources yet plagued by issues that many feel are being overlooked. He emphasizes the dire situation faced by the homeless population—”We have to figure out what we’re going to do with the people that are disenfranchised and living on the streets.” Lamas questions the effectiveness of welfare programs, insisting that there is “nobody that’s accounting for the millions of dollars that are spent on welfare programs.” His words resonate with those who feel helpless as they watch their community struggle without adequate support.
The actor’s call for action comes after a long period of silence regarding his political views. “Over the years I’ve been very careful about voicing an opinion politically,” he admitted. However, his frustration has reached a tipping point, prompting him to speak out against what he describes as a “sickness” within the Democratic Party’s hold on California. His personal connection to the state amplifies his frustration; he recalls growing up in Pacific Palisades and witnessing firsthand the destruction brought about by wildfires. “The fire devastated my hometown. The home I grew up in burned down. My elementary school burned down,” he said, expressing the deep personal impact of the state’s inadequate disaster management.
Lamas argues that the bureaucracy surrounding rebuilding efforts is a major hurdle for those affected by disasters. “There’s just so much red tape, so much bureaucracy,” he notes. His endorsement of Bianco stems from a belief that the sheriff can cut through that inefficiency. Lamas has pointed to Bianco’s focus on cost of living and public safety as indicative of his potential effectiveness as governor. “We’ve got to have a governor that’s pro-law enforcement,” he asserts, highlighting the increasing concerns over crime that frequently occupy the minds of residents—especially parents. Lamas shares his worries for his daughters living in Los Angeles, advising them to stay vigilant in a city where crime seems to be on the rise.
Despite Bianco’s uphill battle as a Republican in a state that has not seen a Republican win a statewide office in nearly twenty years, Lamas expresses confidence in Bianco’s suitability for the role. He believes that Bianco possesses a “tremendous gift” for presenting a commonsense agenda, which he argues will resonate with voters looking for practical solutions.
As news of Lamas’ endorsement spreads, it’s evident that not everyone’s on board with this perspective. Newsom’s camp responded with a dismissive one-word retort—”Who?”—highlighting the divide between two political worlds in California. The tension is palpable as more candidates, including progressive figures like Eric Swalwell and Katie Porter, emerge on the Democratic side.
Lamas’ endorsement of Bianco reflects broader sentiments among those disillusioned with current leadership. He captures the frustrations bubbling beneath the surface in California, calling for change in a system perceived by many as broken. His observations and emotional connection to the state present a compelling case for Bianco’s potential role in transforming California’s future. The question remains whether voters will heed this call for commonsense governance and support a candidate who stands in stark contrast to the current administration.
"*" indicates required fields
