The recent immigration enforcement actions targeting Somali nationals in Minneapolis have sparked significant controversy. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has begun to detain undocumented Somali immigrants with final orders of deportation, igniting intense reactions among local leaders and community members.
Minneapolis Councilmember Jamal Osman has expressed serious concern. During a CNN interview, he remarked, “ICE is on our streets, asking people for documentation. Feels like 1930s, 1940s Germany.” This comparison to a dark chapter of history highlights the anxiety felt within the Somali community, which Osman argues is vital to Minnesota’s economy. “[Somalis] contribute a LOT to Minnesota.” His words reflect a community on edge, facing the reality of federal enforcement in their neighborhoods.
Osman’s statements have not gone unnoticed. A social media response captures the conservative backlash: “Somali Minneapolis Council Member Jamal Osman is PANICKING on CNN that ICE agents are now arresting Somali illegals in his city.” This reaction illustrates the stark divide over the priorities of federal immigration enforcement and the role local authorities should play in those efforts.
The ICE operations are part of a broader initiative by the Trump administration to crack down on undocumented immigrants, specifically targeting those with final orders of removal. While the agency hasn’t disclosed exact figures, anecdotal evidence from immigration advocates suggests that arrests have already begun. Jaylani Hussein, the executive director of CAIR-MN, reported that fewer than a dozen have been detained recently, but the overall impact remains uncertain.
President Trump has been vocal in defending this crackdown. At a Cabinet meeting, he stated, “I don’t want them in our country. Their country is no good for a reason.” His administration has linked Somali immigration to issues of welfare fraud and national security, citing a 2024 New York Times investigation into allegations of misused welfare funds connected to al-Shabaab. As Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent confirmed, an investigation into potential misuse of government aid is underway.
Critics, however, argue that the timing and focus of these actions reveal underlying political motivations. Most Somali residents in Minnesota are U.S. citizens—estimated at 95 percent—and local officials worry that ethnicity-based enforcement could infringe on civil liberties. Mayor Jacob Frey warned, “Targeting Somali people means that due process will be violated, mistakes will be made. American citizens will be detained for no other reason than the fact that they look like they are Somali.”
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara reassured the community that the police department would not engage in federal immigration enforcement. He stated, “We do not work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on civil immigration enforcement operations,” emphasizing the importance of safeguarding public safety and First Amendment rights during protests.
Governor Tim Walz also condemned Trump’s actions as divisive, characterizing the rhetoric surrounding Somali immigrants as “demonizing an entire population.” This perspective reveals a growing concern about the implications of federal immigration policy and local authority dynamics.
The situation underscores a larger debate regarding the balance between federal enforcement and local autonomy. Minneapolis’s sanctuary policies allow the city to limit cooperation with ICE, an approach some criticize while others defend as essential for maintaining trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement.
Adding to the discourse, Jaylani Hussein from CAIR-MN claimed, “We believe this is political rhetoric and an attack against our community. Additional ICE agents mean additional pressure on the wider immigrant community.” Such sentiments highlight the fears among many in Minneapolis’s Somali community about increased scrutiny and pressure from federal agents.
Federal sources describe these enforcement actions not only as a response to immigration violations but also as a crackdown on suspected welfare fraud. Immigration advocates argue that while these issues are serious, the lack of transparency raises concerns about collateral damage, including the risk of U.S. citizens being swept into immigration operations. Mayor Frey cautioned, “They’re going to screw it up so badly that they’re not just violating habeas corpus, but they are taking away the rights of American citizens.”
Although most Somali residents in Minnesota are legally residing in the U.S., officials estimate several hundred could be subject to deportation orders. This situation raises the specter of unintentional enforcement busts that could impact innocent community members.
Councilmember Osman has urged calm amid the chaos, asserting, “Our community has lived through fear in the past, and we are not going to let us divide that.” He advised residents to be aware of their rights and seek legal assistance. The city has taken steps to educate the community, distributing flyers that outline constitutional rights and instructing individuals on how to respond if ICE agents come to their doors.
Public opinion in Minnesota remains sharp and divided. Some residents voice concerns that recent Somali immigrants exploit social services, while others celebrate the economic contributions of the Somali-American community, especially in business and healthcare. A recent report from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development shows that Somali workers are crucial to the state’s labor force, particularly in transportation and home health care services.
The outcome of increased ICE activity in the Twin Cities remains uncertain. Questions linger about whether these federal efforts will lead to meaningful immigration compliance or spark further legal challenges centered on civil rights. For the Somali-American communities in Minneapolis and St. Paul, the atmosphere is one of apprehension and anticipation, navigating the tensions between federal initiatives and local support.
As the political atmosphere heats up, Tom Homan, a former ICE Chief and ally to Trump, was clear in his stance: “We are going to enforce the laws of this country without apology.” This sentiment encapsulates the administration’s intent while illustrating the growing rift between national directives and the realities faced by local communities.
"*" indicates required fields
